• inside_market_data
  • inside_reference_data
  • buy_side_technology
  • sell_side_technology
bst-big-data-panel-elliot-noma-simon-hazlitt-dennis-gonzalez-ken-zockoll-alexander-abramov
Elliot Noma, Garrett Asset Management; Simon Hazlitt, Majedie Asset Management; Dennis Gonzalez, Deutsche Asset Management; Ken Zockoll, FactSet; Alexander Abramov, ISACA.

Credit Suisse's Muthu: Multi-Asset Platforms Good For IT, Not Necessarily Revenue

The bottom line at any financial institution is always the bottom line, as in the dollars and cents. As he wrapped up a panel discussion on the consolidation of trading desks and multi-asset class strategies, it was appropriate that moderator Greg Wood, the director of algorithmic execution in listed derivatives and foreign exchange (FX) at Deutsche Bank, asked the panelists whether the projects had been worth it in the wallet.

"From a trading point of view, I just look at what it's costing me to trade," says Michael Levas, founder of Olympian Capital Management. "If I can reduce my cost to trade, that to me is the most important thing. By the same token I don't want to lose the quality of execution. For example, if you're using a smart order router effectively, there are rebates, there are various little gifts that one gets. From my point of view, it's strictly in reducing the cost of trading."

Deborah Mittelman, global head of product management for direct execution at UBS, adds: "We're constantly trying to measure profitability of a client. What does it cost us to trade with this client and what is your ratio of people to revenues that you should see getting better over time if your technology is performing more effectively. And the final measure, of course, is always earnings per share."

At Credit Suisse, Nachi Muthu, the global head of multi-asset electronic trading, listed derivatives and over-the-counter (OTC) clearing IT, has been tracking the degree to which traders have focused on different asset classes on his multi-asset class platform. The cross-pollination was not particularly high; in fact it was lower than he'd guessed. The usefulness of the platform for the IT side is different, though.

"On that side it makes a lot of sense because the same team is providing coverage from a relationship point of view to the clients as well as providing the core platforms," he says. "The costs are pretty easy to measure and say we have enough savings. From a revenue perspective, at least from a cross-pollination point of view, it was surprising to see it was not that much."

 

Visitor comments Add your comment

  

Add your comment

We won't publish your address

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms & Conditions Your comment will be moderated before publication

Submit your comment
  • Send

More from Buy Side Technology

Get similar articles delivered to your inbox

Inside Reference Data Weekly alert

Related Articles

Latest Media

Events

Voting now open -- WATERS RANKINGS 2013

VOTE NOW

Our 11th annual survey is now open and you get the chance to choose your best solutions and technology providers. Waters Rankings 2013 features 26 hotly contested awards - so have your say.

Waters Rankings 2013 logo

Latest Whitepapers

sap-whitepaper-data-architecture-may2013

Key challenges in data architecture

Complex, dated and unwieldy data infrastructure is not uncommon among even the most progressive companies in the world of finance. As financial regulations...

waterstechnology-whitepaper-sybase-july2012

Key challenges in legal entity identification

With the launch of a new legal entity identifier (LEI) looming, the financial services industry needs to get ready to ensure efficient and timely implementation...