Author: Max Bowie
Source: Inside Market Data | 14 Nov 2011
Categories: Industry Issues & Initiatives | Hosting & Co-location
Topics: Daiwa SecuritiesTokyo Stock ExchangeHong Kong Exchanges & ClearingAsia Pacific Financial Information ConferenceABN AMRO
Panelists at last week’s conference called for ways to make co-location more accessible to make cross-market trading more practical in the region.
Exchanges are too restrictive over who can access the centers, and do not provide sufficient latency transparency to allow firms to tune their trading algorithms, said Del Abdullah, head of electronic trading technology at Daiwa Securities.
Demand for connections between venues in Japan is growing, “but if you are in the Tokyo Stock Exchange’s co-lo center, you can’t connect to other venues, even if they are in the same building—and that hinders business, because you can’t perform best execution or take advantage of different tick sizes on different exchanges,” said Miguel Ortega, market data engineer at Deutsche Securities Japan, who added that regulation may be required to force datacenter operators to open themselves to competing venues in the interests of best execution and good business.
“Exchanges being in a public datacenter where they could cross-connect would make more economic sense,” said Chris Lee, global head of direct access and electronic brokerage at ABN Amro Clearing, who moderated the panel. “But I don’t think regulation will drive exchanges into co-locations—though maybe exchange mergers would, or maybe if an exchange finds itself with empty racks in a big co-lo center that it invested a lot of money in.”
However, Jonathan Leung, vice president of market development and head of hosting services at Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing, said HKEx’s policy for its own co-lo center will be more relaxed than other restrictive exchange agreements, and that in future, exchange datacenters will be required to provide more value to clients.
“From a technical standpoint, the point at which the speed of light becomes the limitation will probably be what creates a more level playing field,” Ortega said. “So then it comes down to who has better strategies and who makes best use of market conditions, rather than it just being a latency arms race.”
More from Inside Market Data
Related Articles
Latest Media
Events
Updating your subscription status
Subscribe to WatersTechnology
WatersTechnology has been designed with our end-users in mind so now you can pick and choose what content you wish to subscribe to and make considerable savings.
Visit our subscribe page now to see which WatersTechnology subscription package suits you.
Events
Email Alerts
Latest Whitepapers
New regulations such as Basel III are changing trading and risk practices by rewarding banks that actively manage their risk exposure at an enterprise...
Supporting multiple securities identifiers imposes an operational burden that adds cost and latency to critical trading processes. Bloomberg’s recently...
Visitor comments Add your comment