Getting Corporate Actions Out Of The Basement
Volume and Complexity Should Surpass Standards Concerns
As my colleagues and I prepare agendas for this year's Financial Information Summit conferences beginning in April in Tokyo, we have been considering whether corporate actions has enough interesting or important developments happening to warrant discussion. The question of the importance of corporate actions is particularly of interest for the North American Financial Information Summit to be held in New York in May.
Maybe professionals who work with corporate actions would take us to task for even suggesting there might not be a lot happening in their space, but even some of them have been saying there has not been a lot to warrant attention.
Nevertheless, organizations such as the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC), which have a vested interest in addressing corporate actions as a data management challenge, are certainly going to see a lot of action happening in the field.
But for many others, because corporate actions are considered a back-office responsibility, they end up getting viewed as the proverbial "crazy aunt in the basement," as presidential candidate Ross Perot once famously referred to the national debt—stating that everyone knows she's there but no-one wants to acknowledge her presence.
Part of the problem could be that the industry has gotten hung up on the sub-topic of corporate actions messaging standards, and whether a bigger swath of the industry will adopt the more advanced ISO 20022 standard. What appears to be more material, and more important to actually making corporate actions more compelling as an area to address, is growing sophistication in the number of fields included in a corporate action, and issues that could be created by discrepancies in the same data elements from different sources.
In addition, increased volume and complexity ought to be sparking greater interest, just as that development did with legal entity identifiers, when their registration started driving new volumes of data to manage.
Professionals in the industry began speaking more about the new complexity in corporate actions in the fall, and told listeners of our October 29 webcast how this complexity will make efficiency and optimization of corporate actions processing more challenging. As this year progresses, it remains to be seen whether it's so challenging that it captures more interest in the industry.
Would you agree? Will this be borne out in reality? Please share your thoughts on the importance of these developments in corporate actions on our LinkedIn discussion group, where this column will also be posted with an invitation to comment.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 10 years of our best content.
Getting aggressive: Overbond uses AI to assess dealer axes
The fixed-income analytics specialist has developed a new tool to help buy-side firms decide if they’re getting a good price from their dealers.
TS Imagine integrates LTX’s pre-trade analytics tool
Users of the fixed-income EMS will now have access to LTX’s Liquidity Cloud tool, which provides a pre-trade score for the likelihood of trading success.
European exchanges turn to dark trading in battle for flow
The EU’s two biggest exchanges are launching dark pools this year. The apparent change in their stances on dark trading reflects a profound shift in equities markets.
After contentious Opra upgrades, vendors brace for a faster future
Upgrades to the datafeed widely used to gauge the current market price for options contracts went into effect in February after three separate delays, which market participants say were caused by persistent bandwidth issues at some important recipients.
The IMD Wrap: No more turf wars, or why CDOs should heed the Voice of the CTO
Max reviews how our recent Voice of the CTO series has implications for those beyond a firm’s technology function, and how communication and collaboration between tech, data, and leadership will deliver better results.
Dark horse: Deutsche Börse building dark pool
New functionality allowing exchange members to execute sweep trades comes hot on the heels of European rival Euronext launching its own dark pool.
Waters Wrap: The tough climb for startups
Anthony speaks with two seasoned technologists to better understand why startups have such a tough time getting banks and asset managers to sign on the dotted line.
Most read
- Women in Technology & Data Awards 2024: All the winners and why they won
- Witad Awards 2024: Above and beyond award (vendor)—Susan Bennett, Tradeweb
- Fighting FAIRR: Inside the bill aiming to keep AI and algos honest