Nobody Reads These Things Anyway, Right?
Not such a good week for the folks at Deutsche Bank, then, who endured vast embarrassment over multi-year reporting errors after the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) issued its final notice on Thursday.
The fine itself for the errors ─ which saw every equity swap contract-for-difference trade reported with reversed buy and sell indicators from November 2007 to April 2013 ─ was relatively paltry at around $7.8 million. The damage was far more on the visible, public relations side, accompanied with statements from the FCA that were vociferous enough to force a wince, a sharp intake of breath through the teeth, and a collective murmur of "ouch" around the newsroom when the e-mail landed in various reporters' inboxes.
Frankly, it's remarkable on both sides. On Frankfurt's, in that nobody at the bank bothered to check a transaction report in six years. On the FCA's side, that nobody bothered to look into this sooner. The authority was aware of reporting problems at Deutsche by all accounts, having issued it a private warning for similar problems at an earlier time, but this didn't flag up until February 2013.
As Deutsche Bank is a passporting entity under the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive, the FCA doesn't have the ability to penalize it for systems and process failures, which probably explains the limited pecuniary penalty. That responsibility lies firmly with Bafin, the German regulator. To Deutsche's credit, while it doesn't excuse 30 million incorrect reports, it swung into action immediately after it was asked to validate its reports by the FCA, and privately, people with knowledge of the matter also point out that a large number of other banks have been fined for similar contraventions. Which is somewhat similar to being caught burying the bodies, and shouting: "Look at what the other guys did! Look! Look at what they did!", but I suppose they have to try.
Last week, I filed my column for this month's edition of Waters, which should be live this morning on the website. In that column, I said that it was going to be hard to push on ahead with more complex regulation if people can't get the basics of reporting right. Lo and behold, three days after filing that piece, exactly that happens. It should reinforce the point that there is something fundamentally broken with how reporting is working at present, something that rather desperately needs attention ─ unless we all think that match rates as low as three percent for EMIR-related reporting structures are even remotely useful? And as Matthew Coupe, director of regulation and market structure at Nice Actimize pointed out when I quoted him in my story on the Deutsche Bank debacle, the regulators need to start recognizing that effect market surveillance doesn't just rely on one monitoring vector.
Mark also, on the side, the increasingly combative tone being taken by regulators. For the FCA, its comments (out of quotes and in the collective context) about how alarming it found Deutsche's errors, and for the European Securities and Markets Authority, its strenuous and belligerent insistence that it's done enough on reporting. Something to keep in mind.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
Chris Edmonds takes the reins at ICE Fixed Income and Data Services
Edmonds is now leading ICE’s fixed income and data business as the rush to provide better data and analytics in fixed income builds.
Systematic tools gain favor in fixed income
Automation is enabling systematic strategies in fixed income that were previously reserved for equities trading. The tech gap between the two may be closing, but differences remain.
Waters Wrap: Examining the changing EMS landscape
After LSEG’s decision to sunset Redi, Anthony examines what might lie ahead for the EMS space.
This Week: Clear Street, AXA/AWS, TD Bank/Google Cloud and more
A summary of the latest financial technology news.
LSEG to sunset Redi EMS in favor of Tora
Sources say competitors will look to seize on the decision to win over Redi’s sizeable US client base.
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 10 years of our best content.
Getting aggressive: Overbond uses AI to assess dealer axes
The fixed-income analytics specialist has developed a new tool to help buy-side firms decide if they’re getting a good price from their dealers.
Most read
- Chris Edmonds takes the reins at ICE Fixed Income and Data Services
- Deutsche Börse democratizes data with Marketplace offering
- Sell-Side Technology Awards 2024: All the winners