Buy-Side Technology Awards 2016: Winners' Circle—Symbiont

Firm's president and chairman discusses the win.

symbiont-caitlin-long
Caitlin Long

As firms look to begin implementing distributed-ledger technologies, what will be the biggest factors they look for in potential partners? How does Symbiont’s Smart Securities address these requests?

Caitlin Long, president and chairman at Symbiont: Institutional users of distributed-ledger technologies are looking primarily for security, privacy and performance within a permissioned platform. Symbiont’s platform meets each of these requirements. We have market-leading performance, as the speed of our ledger layer—80,000 transactions per second—is multiple orders of magnitude superior to competing platforms. Our security and privacy solutions meet the strict requirements of institutional users, and we proved that in the syndicated loans pilot (which we built along with our joint venture partner, Ipreo). Four major buy-side firms gave our system a test run in that project, within a group of 15 financial institutions, and it passed with flying colors—so much so that others have since joined the project.

How are the buy side’s needs different than the sell side’s when it comes to distributed-ledger technologies?

Long: The needs of the buy and sell sides are really not that different, with one exception—the buy side is more interested in faster settlement than some parts of the sell side. Prime brokerage desks, for example, make money from the delayed settlement inherent to the current market structure that involves multiple intermediaries. We have always said that the biggest beneficiary of distributed-ledger technology is the long-only investment community (pensions, mutual funds, insurance companies and mom and pop investors), and faster settlement enabled by distributed-ledger technology is one of the biggest reasons why we believe this. The long-only community doesn’t benefit from delayed settlement but faces a lot of costs as a result of it—ranging from outdated shareholder lists that cause proxy voting inaccuracies, to the cost of Treasury Market Practices Group (TMPG) fails (stemming from slow collateral settlement), to the risk that a broker-dealer fails with unsettled trades outstanding. Delaware Chancery Court judge Travis Laster calls blockchain the “plunger” that can clean up the financial system’s plumbing, and in a September speech to the Council of Institutional Investors he challenged the buy side to “take back the voting and stockholding infrastructure of the US securities markets” from the sell side. We’d encourage the buy side to read his speech in its entirety.

Symbiont is involved in a pilot project in the syndicated loans space with the buy side. What are the goals of the project and how successful has it been?

Long: Its main goal is to reduce loan settlement times to three days from an average of approximately three weeks currently. Faster settlement will reduce the capital charges faced by agent banks and substantially improve risk-adjusted returns on capital in the syndicated loans business. The faster velocity of capital should improve liquidity in the market generally. For the buy side specifically, there’s an inherent risk issue when a fund offers daily liquidity in an asset class whose settlement cycle is measured in weeks, not days. And, of course, both the buy and sell sides benefit from operational cost reductions. The project has successfully met three of five milestones and is expected to be completed in early December.

Symbiont also took part in a pilot program with Allianz and Nephila Capital around a catastrophe swap transaction. Can you elaborate on what that involved?

Long: This project, like the syndicated loans project, also involved the buy side—as Nephila is one of the largest investors in insurance-linked securities. The deliverable in this pilot was a catastrophe swap involving Allianz and Nephila, but the technology is portable to any type of swap or reinsurance contract. The “smart swap” we created for this project automates payments when the swap was triggered—in this case, the trigger was a storm whose losses (as calculated by an independent calculation agent) exceeded a threshold amount. The project delivered a perfect audit trail and proved that record-keeping costs can be reduced by avoiding the need to reconcile. Allianz is continuing to work toward deploying distributed-ledger technology, as it subsequently announced that it formed a consortium with four other major insurance companies, called B3i, to facilitate multi-party projects in the insurance industry. 

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here