May 2014: Regulators’ Arbitrary Line in the Sand
How fast is too fast? That’s a question a lot of people have been pondering for some time, and thanks to the release of Michael Lewis’ Flash Boys, it seems that just about everyone has an opinion on high-speed trading (HFT). I am finding Flash Boys particularly stimulating, even though I am distinctly uncomfortable with Lewis’ disparaging description of RBC’s acquisition of Carlin Financial and his overt character assassination of Jeremy Frommer, the firm’s founder and CEO. I’m not defending Frommer—I don’t know him, nor do I want to—but I also don’t think it’s particularly ethical or savory to be so blatantly boorish. I think it’s safe to say that Lewis and Brad Katsuyama, his primary source for the book, have been crossed off RBC’s and Frommer’s Christmas-card list for the foreseeable future.
This issue is not peculiar to the capital markets, however. In track and field, for example, the International Amateur Athletics Federation—an anachronism if ever there was one, given that all international athletes these days are professionals—has adopted the 0.100-second rule for starts up to and including the 400 meters, meaning that athletes reacting to the starting gun within that timeframe are deemed to have false-started due to their “physiologically impossible” reaction times. A similar, seemingly arbitrary rule cannot be applied to the capital markets, however, where machines are responsible for reacting to market stimuli in moments so fleetingly swift that they make humans appear sloth-like.
In his column, Max Bowie argues that while HFT practices are still, amazingly, misunderstood in certain circles, drawing a line in the sand and effectively penalizing those firms that have deployed the technology and services that provide them with an edge over their rivals, risks standing in the way of progress. Max reasons that an advantage only becomes an unfair one when technologies or services are withheld from certain market participants.
In the current HFT debate, this is clearly not the case. Some might argue, however, that the underlying costs associated with the practice are prohibitive to some firms, although the same rationale could be applied to the industry’s most in-demand portfolio managers and traders in terms of their remuneration packages. Perhaps the regulators will introduce a draft system similar to the one currently used in the NFL, where weaker teams, determined by their previous season’s performance, get first pick of the new crop of talent. This would certainly render the capital markets playing field more equitable. And from there, it’s just a hop, skip and a jump to socialism.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
WatersTechnology latest edition
Check out our latest edition, plus more than 10 years of our best content.
Getting aggressive: Overbond uses AI to assess dealer axes
The fixed-income analytics specialist has developed a new tool to help buy-side firms decide if they’re getting a good price from their dealers.
TS Imagine integrates LTX’s pre-trade analytics tool
Users of the fixed-income EMS will now have access to LTX’s Liquidity Cloud tool, which provides a pre-trade score for the likelihood of trading success.
European exchanges turn to dark trading in battle for flow
The EU’s two biggest exchanges are launching dark pools this year. The apparent change in their stances on dark trading reflects a profound shift in equities markets.
After contentious Opra upgrades, vendors brace for a faster future
Upgrades to the datafeed widely used to gauge the current market price for options contracts went into effect in February after three separate delays, which market participants say were caused by persistent bandwidth issues at some important recipients.
The IMD Wrap: No more turf wars, or why CDOs should heed the Voice of the CTO
Max reviews how our recent Voice of the CTO series has implications for those beyond a firm’s technology function, and how communication and collaboration between tech, data, and leadership will deliver better results.
Dark horse: Deutsche Börse building dark pool
New functionality allowing exchange members to execute sweep trades comes hot on the heels of European rival Euronext launching its own dark pool.
Waters Wrap: The tough climb for startups
Anthony speaks with two seasoned technologists to better understand why startups have such a tough time getting banks and asset managers to sign on the dotted line.
Most read
- Women in Technology & Data Awards 2024: All the winners and why they won
- Witad Awards 2024: Above and beyond award (vendor)—Susan Bennett, Tradeweb
- Fighting FAIRR: Inside the bill aiming to keep AI and algos honest