James Rundle: A Different View of Data
The US Commodity Future Trading Commission’s (CFTC’s) inability to even perform basic analysis on the data from transaction reports, as admitted during Commissioner Scott O’Malia’s keynote address at the Swift Standards Forum in London last month, is alarming. It’s not good news for the market as a whole, which needs robust oversight to engender confidence, and it’s not good for individual market participants either, who struggled to put systems in place for reporting, only to find that the information they submit is essentially useless.
Elements of the CFTC clearly believe that they can use technology to overcome this difficulty, fix the glaring blind spot in their wing mirror, and go about actually taking control of market activity. And they can. The technology definitely exists to link futures and swaps markets, crunch the data, throw out analytics, and enable regulators to ask all kinds of weird and wonderful questions about where risk is. But while the technology exists, it’s doubtful whether the CFTC will be able to develop it without a significant increase in resources.
Indeed, some even question whether the CFTC necessarily needs to be able to install a Skynet-esque big data engine that will alert them, in real time, to all possible instances of market manipulation and risk vectors. Some say that a far simpler approach is manageable, and indeed, preferable.
Let’s break reporting down into its primary goals, which are to allow regulators to gain a view of market activity in order to assess weak points, specifically on an institutional level, providing them with a means to measure and manage systemic risk on a wider scale. While I was working on a feature regarding the problems that have occurred in both Europe and the US in terms of establishing reporting regimes with respect to derivatives transactions this month, most practitioners I spoke to pointed out that the CFTC could accomplish this by asking certain questions of swap data repositories (SDRs) alone.
The simplest question would be asking the SDRs to provide the CFTC with a ranked list of which institutions have the highest level of failures per day. Those in the top five consistently are then selected for a site visit and a deep dive into their holdings and books, because their house is clearly not in order. Likewise, as Sapient Global Markets' Cian Ó Braonáin argued, for concentration risk measurement, the most useful tool is clearly identifying products and the notional value on them, which should give regulators an indication of who is trading what and where. Once significant positions are identified, that too can lead to a visit to establish areas such as being over-exposed to a certain product or entity, or over-leveraged across markets.
What it comes down to is an argument over the very essence of surveillance on a regulatory scale.
Surveillance
What it comes down to is an argument over the very essence of surveillance on a regulatory scale. Is it better to be proactive, in which case, technology is the only way to institute real-time alerting, ad-hoc trend analysis, and all of the other areas that the CFTC is looking at? Or is it better to be reactive, where analysis of data is shared among various regulatory agencies, historical information is widely used, and people take priority over machine-driven forensics?
Both approaches have their benefits and drawbacks. The real-time surveillance aspect only works once the rules are properly configured, and it’s nearly impossible to account for every possible permutation of market abuse, systemic fraud, or for any other kind of risk for that matter.
Artificial intelligence would likely be a prerequisite, although on the post-trade, forensic side, it limits the ability of regulators to react quickly to events, and indeed, that loss of speed when the markets themselves move so fast is perhaps too wide to be realistically considered. But something should be done, because the system in its current form simply isn’t working.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Verafin launches genAI copilot for fincrime investigators
Features include document summarization and improved research tools.
Waters Wrap: Open source and storm clouds on the horizon
Regulators and politicians in America and Europe are increasingly concerned about AI—and, by extension, open-source development. Anthony says there are real reasons for concern.
DSB says industry is ready to meet UPI mandate ahead of deadline
The Unique Product Identifier will be required for certain OTC derivatives in the EU at the end of April, following US adoption in January.
‘Very careful thought’: T+1 will introduce costs, complexities for ETF traders
When the US moves to T+1 at the end of May 2024, firms trading ETFs will need to automate their workflows as much as possible to avoid "settlement misalignment" and additional costs.
Court case probes open-source licenses as movement stands at crossroads
The Software Freedom Conservancy’s lawsuit against TV-maker Vizio begins trial in California, raising questions about open-source licenses and the risks posed by adhering to them.
Waters Wavelength Podcast: Countdown to T+1
DTCC’s Val Wotton joins the podcast this week to discuss the impending move to T+1 in the US.
Consolidated tape hopefuls gear up for uncertain tender process
The bond tapes in the UK and EU are on track to be authorized in 2025. Prospective bidders for the role of provider must choose where to focus their efforts in anticipation of more regulatory clarity on the tender process.
Fighting FAIRR: Inside the bill aiming to keep AI and algos honest
The Financial Artificial Intelligence Risk Reduction Act seeks to fix a market abuse loophole by declaring that AI algorithms do not have brains.
Most read
- Chris Edmonds takes the reins at ICE Fixed Income and Data Services
- Deutsche Börse democratizes data with Marketplace offering
- Waters Wavelength Podcast: Broadridge’s Joseph Lo on GPTs