Opening Cross: Everybody Wins When the Customer Is Always Right… Right?

Give the customer what they want... even if that means a way out.

max-bowie

But in the market data world, this is becoming increasingly hard to find. In part, it’s those pesky customers. To use the hotel analogy to represent market data costs, no-one wants to stay in a full-service luxury hotel anymore; they want a budget motel with an itemized bill and a free breakfast. Meanwhile, to protect incumbent business, vendors have made it difficult to switch away from their products, by integrating them with infrastructures that are hard to unwind.

For years, firms have pursued true best-of-breed data architectures, with limited success, while projects such as Collaborative Software Initiative tried to create abstraction layers to facilitate these moves—itself failing to get sufficient buy-in.

Yet, there now appears to be greater momentum around change, and—with the maturing of the OpenMAMA open-source messaging technology—a vehicle to achieve it.

OpenMAMA was open-sourced in 2011 by NYSE Technologies based on the Middleware-Agnostic Messaging API layer built by Wombat Financial Software, which NYSE acquired in 2008. But NYSE Tech—assembled via a string of acquisitions—never achieved the ambitions of its owner (former NYSE Tech chief executive Stanley Young once laid out plans to grow it to a $1 billion business), and was ultimately spun off in pieces by new owners Intercontinental Exchange, with ICE CEO Jeffrey Sprecher saying “[The NYSE Technologies assets] are... things that my colleagues and I don’t understand, and I don’t think we should be in businesses that we don’t understand.”

Yet with broad industry support, and removed from a single owner with vested interests, OpenMAMA is now showing the promise of being able to succeed where previous efforts have failed. In this week’s issue, we detail two such efforts. First, London-based market data toolkit vendor Tick42 has built a “bridge” between OpenMAMA and Thomson Reuters’ Enterprise Platform (TREP—formerly known as RMDS), ostensibly for connecting different data sources to TREP, but also to allow developers to write applications to the OpenMAMA API rather than directly to TREP, ultimately giving them the option of removing TREP altogether and replacing it with a different vendor’s solution—providing that the new vendor also supports OpenMAMA.

And second, low-latency data technology endor SR Labs—which acquired the Wombat business and MAMA API from NYSE Technologies last year—is building a new hosted data management platform that incorporates tools for compliance and usage monitoring, but which also integrates OpenMAMA to make it easier for firms to connect applications to the platform, and to swap out parts of other vendor’s infrastructures in favor of its own platform, using OpenMAMA as a sort of abstraction layer that standardizes vendor connections.

The great thing about these initiatives is that they don’t necessarily end up displacing a specific vendor, but—like the services launched by GFI and Bolsas y Mercados Espanoles for measuring swaps clearing spreads on different clearinghouses, and for transaction cost analysis, respectively—provide customers with more choice, forcing vendors to be more competitive and responsive. If an incumbent vendor ups its game to fend off rival vendors who are now in a better position to compete, then it may well remain the incumbent, and either way, the customer is happy.  In short, everybody wins.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.

Systematic tools gain favor in fixed income

Automation is enabling systematic strategies in fixed income that were previously reserved for equities trading. The tech gap between the two may be closing, but differences remain.

Why recent failures are a catalyst for DLT’s success

Deutsche Bank’s Mathew Kathayanat and Jie Yi Lee argue that DLT's high-profile failures don't mean the technology is dead. Now that the hype has died down, the path is cleared for more measured decisions about DLT’s applications.

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here