Hot Take Alert: Are Banks Tacitly Asking for More Regulation to Squeeze Out Smaller Competitors?
Rising regulations could end up helping big banks in the long term when it comes to their competiting with smaller firms.
There is nothing in this world quite like a hot take.
For the uninformed, a hot take is an opinion on steroids. Most commonly seen in sports, hot takes are brash, unapologetic and controversial. Commonly found on social media, hot takes are the kind of statements that make you scratch your head and go, "Really?"
So, naturally, I wasn't expecting to come across a hot take while attending the Toronto Financial Information and Technology Summit 2016 this week. Conferences like these, filled with educated, logical people aren't exactly the breeding ground for hot takes.
But I'll be damned if I didn't find one. There it was, staring me dead in the eyes, via sli.do:
The takes are ??? at @WatersTech #tofis pic.twitter.com/A3ZGHCjLrd
— Dan DeFrancesco (@dandefrancesco) June 7, 2016
"Have big banks implicitly encouraged over regulation and reporting as a way to handicap their smaller counterparts and push them out of the business?"
As far as hot takes go, it doesn't get much prettier than that. It's the kind of question you laugh at the first time you read it, but then you actually start to consider it, which is the epitome of a perfect hot take. Every hot take holds the slightest bit of truth.
Break it Down
So let's digest this unexpected question of ours. At first glance, it looks ridiculous. Big banks are constantly complaining about regulatory fatigue. I have yet to attend a conference where firms haven't brought up the strain of regulatory requirements on their budget.
The story I wrote last month about Steve Luparello of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), who spoke at Sifma Ops 2016 about the constant stream of regulations, was one of our most-read stories for two weeks straight.
The bottom line: Big banks, across the board, are always looking for some relief when it comes to meeting regulatory requirements.
So when you consider all that, saying that banks are actually asking for MORE regulations seems crazy.
...or does it?
Get an Edge
It doesn't take a genius to recognize financial firms aren't shy about trying to get any competitive advantages they can. It's also fair to say that big banks are better suited to handle complex reporting regulations than their smaller counterparts.
Keeping up with regulations is hardly easy work, but banks, with their massive compliance departments and large budgets, can do a better job of navigating the rules than smaller firms. And while I'm sure most firms wouldn't outright say they want more reporting requirements, I could see a situation where they wouldn't mind spending some money on regulations if it would lead to thinning the herd.
As the old saying goes, you've got to spend money to make money. Look no further than the very conference I was at.
I wrote about former Blue Cross Life Canada CEO and president Jim Gilligan, who outright said he believes there will be greater regulatory oversight placed upon fintechs. While it's not a direct correlation, as Gilligan is asking for compliance requirements for an unregulated area as opposed to more regulations across the board, the reasoning is still the same.
Gilligan said regulating fintechs would ensure a "fair game" between upstarts and big firms and added that large insurance firms have tended to "drift along" in recent years, allowing smaller firms to break into the space.
His point was based on a speech made by TD Bank CEO Bharat Masrani at the bank's annual meeting in Montreal in March in which Masrani called for regulatory oversight of fintechs. Masrani said the reason he was asking for regulatory action was to protect customers and their data, however, Masrani and every other CEO at a big bank is certainly concerned about competing against these new, agile upstarts.
And so, when you start to think about it, suddenly that hot take doesn't seem so hot anymore.
This week on the Waters Wavelength podcast ─ Episode 20: CAT, Unbundling Research, June Features
If you haven't already, subscribe to the podcast on iTunes here. Also, check out our SoundCloud account here.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
DSB says industry is ready to meet UPI mandate ahead of deadline
The Unique Product Identifier will be required for certain OTC derivatives in the EU at the end of April, following US adoption in January.
‘Very careful thought’: T+1 will introduce costs, complexities for ETF traders
When the US moves to T+1 at the end of May 2024, firms trading ETFs will need to automate their workflows as much as possible to avoid "settlement misalignment" and additional costs.
Court case probes open-source licenses as movement stands at crossroads
The Software Freedom Conservancy’s lawsuit against TV-maker Vizio begins trial in California, raising questions about open-source licenses and the risks posed by adhering to them.
Waters Wavelength Podcast: Countdown to T+1
DTCC’s Val Wotton joins the podcast this week to discuss the impending move to T+1 in the US.
Consolidated tape hopefuls gear up for uncertain tender process
The bond tapes in the UK and EU are on track to be authorized in 2025. Prospective bidders for the role of provider must choose where to focus their efforts in anticipation of more regulatory clarity on the tender process.
Fighting FAIRR: Inside the bill aiming to keep AI and algos honest
The Financial Artificial Intelligence Risk Reduction Act seeks to fix a market abuse loophole by declaring that AI algorithms do not have brains.
Waters Wrap: The rise of AI washing… and regulation washing?
The SEC recently levied fines against two investment advisors over “AI washing”. Anthony takes issue with the announcement.
Prepare now for the inevitable: T+1 isn’t just a US challenge
The DTCC’s Val Wotton believes that firms around the globe should view North America’s move to T+1 as an opportunity—because it’s inevitable.
Most read
- Sell-Side Technology Awards 2024: All the winners
- Deutsche Börse democratizes data with Marketplace offering
- Sell-Side Technology Awards 2024: Best sell-side front-office platform—Bloomberg