Dan DeFrancesco: The Art of the Deadline
Deadlines on regulations in the capital markets are rarely hard and fast. Dan discusses why the back and forth between regulators and firms is so frustrating.
My first indication of how regulation deadlines in the capital markets work came very early in my career at Waters. Having covered sports for the past two years at The Journal News, a daily newspaper in New York’s Hudson Valley, the capital markets and the technology that powers them, were an unfamiliar space to me.
So when I dove into my second feature, a story outlining the consolidated audit trail (CAT) and the six finalists vying for a chance to build it, one of my biggest concerns was around the CAT’s deadlines. I was worried that the self-regulatory organizations (SROs) and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (Finra), which together are tasked with picking one of the finalists to build the CAT, would select a winning bid before my story, scheduled to run in November 2014, was live. I will pause here for you all to laugh at me.
I could almost hear my sources smirking at me through the phone line when I called to make sure a finalist would not be selected before my story went live. Here we are, over a year later, and we are seemingly no closer to picking a group to build the CAT.
Call me naïve. Call me optimistic. In my mind, a deadline had been set and it needed to be met. At the time, the SROs and Finra had already been granted two extensions when it came to submitting the National Market System (NMS) Plan, which details how to create, implement and maintain the CAT. How much longer could they really delay the process?
Deadlines
It is time for the regulators to push back. After all, too many missed deadlines and everyone suffers.
For those who have been in the industry for a while, it might seem like a foolish question to ask, but understand where I’m coming from. As a journalist, deadlines are sacred. They are not flexible. If I miss one, all of my colleagues have to work harder to make up for it and I run the risk of incurring the wrath of my editor.
So it seems natural that, with the obvious need for a system like the CAT, getting it up and running would be a top priority for the industry. But that’s not the way things go in the capital markets when it comes to regulations and their deadlines. Just look at the European Union, which announced this November that it was set to delay the introduction of Mifid II by as much as a year.
Patience or Apathy?
Deadlines, and the art of pushing them back, are essentially a cat-and-mouse game between regulators and the firms they affect. Talk to a regulator and they’ll tell you that such-and-such a regulation absolutely, positively needs to be implemented as soon as possible. In fact, according to them, it’s a miracle the industry has been able to function and not completely crumble without these certain set of rules in place.
On the other hand, a firm will tell you that it simply cannot afford to spend another penny on compliance. The budget is so tight that there is no way it could implement another platform or solution into what is already a massive legacy system to meet some new regulatory requirements.
These are exaggerated takes for both sides, but they’re not that far off. The truth, as is the case almost always in life, is somewhere in the middle.
And while I originally sided with SROs and Finra in May, writing an opinion piece about the benefits of showing patience during the CAT selection and development process, I think enough is enough.
In October, The Wall Street Journal reported that the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC’s) top choice to oversee technological development of the CAT reneged on his acceptance of the position. Later that month, a conference panel featuring four of the six CAT bidders voiced concerns around the system’s data security and the best way to report information to the CAT (click here).
The SROs and Finra have dragged their feet for too long. It is time for the regulators to push back. After all, too many missed deadlines and everyone suffers.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Emerging Technologies
Former Goldman analyst aims to blend GenAI and synthetic data with start-up
Synthera.ai is taking a novel approach to calculating risk. While promising, industry observers are skeptical.
Waters Wavelength Podcast: Bloomberg’s Tony McManus
Tony McManus, global head of enterprise data division at Bloomberg, joins the podcast to talk about the importance of data in the context of AI and GenAI.
Devil’s Bargain: Closed architecture systems will derail AI ambitions
Rob Flatley explains why closed-off systems will fall flat when it comes to AI adoption.
This Week: First Trust/Bloomberg/New Constructs, Cboe/Metaurus, LTX/MultiLynq, and more
A summary of the latest financial technology news.
Waters Wavelength Podcast: S&P’s CTO on AI, data, and the future of datacenters
Frank Tarsillo, CTO at S&P Global Market Intelligence, joins the podcast to discuss the firm’s approach to AI, the importance of data, and what might be in store for datacenters in the coming years.
BMO’s cloud migration strategy eases AI adoption
The Canadian bank is embracing a more digital future as its cloud strategy makes gains and it looks to both traditional machine learning and generative AI for further augmentation.
Waters Wrap: GenAI and rising tides
As banks, asset managers, and vendors ratchet up generative AI experiments and rollouts, Anthony explains why collaboration between business and tech teams is crucial.
Most read
- Waters Wavelength Podcast: S&P’s CTO on AI, data, and the future of datacenters
- Waters Wavelength Podcast: Bloomberg’s Tony McManus
- Chris Edmonds takes the reins at ICE Fixed Income and Data Services