Keeping Swift in the LEI Mix
Hyperbolic pronouncements from other trade publications and critics aside, the International Organization for Standardization's (ISO) removal of Swift's registration authority role from the legal entity identifier (LEI) standard, as reported by Nicholas Hamilton, won't end Swift's role in administering the LEI.
Necessity and reality dictate that Swift should continue to be involved as a competent authority and a central organizing body for the LEI. Large volumes of messages using the new LEI standard will go through Swift regardless, so it makes sense that the identifiers get registered in some way with that financial messaging services provider.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB), which is deliberating standards for the global LEI, initiated ISO's removal of Swift. The FSB sought this to avoid a potential conflict between Swift and itself, each governing the LEI. Certainly having dueling authorities handling the same function would have created the sort of confusion the LEI is supposed to solve in the first place.
Undoubtedly, Swift and the FSB will have to keep talking and maintain dialogue as the LEI is fine-tuned and eventually implemented. These bodies need to coordinate their activities to make sure the planned global LEI is synchronized everywhere. If the FSB were to "go it alone," the LEI could start out the same everywhere, but might end up having variations between its use through Swift and its use elsewhere, which again would defeat the purpose of instituting it.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
DSB says industry is ready to meet UPI mandate ahead of deadline
The Unique Product Identifier will be required for certain OTC derivatives in the EU at the end of April, following US adoption in January.
‘Very careful thought’: T+1 will introduce costs, complexities for ETF traders
When the US moves to T+1 at the end of May 2024, firms trading ETFs will need to automate their workflows as much as possible to avoid "settlement misalignment" and additional costs.
Court case probes open-source licenses as movement stands at crossroads
The Software Freedom Conservancy’s lawsuit against TV-maker Vizio begins trial in California, raising questions about open-source licenses and the risks posed by adhering to them.
Waters Wavelength Podcast: Countdown to T+1
DTCC’s Val Wotton joins the podcast this week to discuss the impending move to T+1 in the US.
Consolidated tape hopefuls gear up for uncertain tender process
The bond tapes in the UK and EU are on track to be authorized in 2025. Prospective bidders for the role of provider must choose where to focus their efforts in anticipation of more regulatory clarity on the tender process.
Fighting FAIRR: Inside the bill aiming to keep AI and algos honest
The Financial Artificial Intelligence Risk Reduction Act seeks to fix a market abuse loophole by declaring that AI algorithms do not have brains.
Waters Wrap: The rise of AI washing… and regulation washing?
The SEC recently levied fines against two investment advisors over “AI washing”. Anthony takes issue with the announcement.
Prepare now for the inevitable: T+1 isn’t just a US challenge
The DTCC’s Val Wotton believes that firms around the globe should view North America’s move to T+1 as an opportunity—because it’s inevitable.
Most read
- Sell-Side Technology Awards 2024: All the winners
- Sell-Side Technology Awards 2024: Best sell-side front-office platform—Bloomberg
- Deutsche Börse democratizes data with Marketplace offering