Open Season For Instrument Codes?
This might be slightly belated, but there are some considerations to note about Thomson Reuters opening the Reuters Instrument Codes (RICs) to outside desktops and feeds a few weeks ago. Whether RICs were opened up in response to the European Union's antitrust inquiries, as some have suggested, or just to lead the way to more commercial opportunities for Thomson Reuters, one has to wonder whether simply making once-proprietary codes open-source is the way this should be handled.
Thomson Reuters' opening of RICs follows Bloomberg's decision to open its instrument codes back in 2009, while the Cusip standard operated by Standard & Poor's has always been open. Should instrument codes be handled like the legal entity identifier (LEI), which will have its administrators and operators chosen under guidelines set by agencies including Europe's Financial Stability Board (FSB)?
Ed Ventura, president of industry consultancy Ventura Management Associates, suggests such a possibility. "There's a cost to maintain them," he says of the instrument codes. "They should be open, but I am sensitive to the commercial understanding of it."
While it might not be feasible or possible to standardize several different proprietary instrument codes, in another facet of identification – the LEI – the task before the industry now is to implement a federated model out of the central operating units and local operating units structure that the Financial Stability Board (FSB) has designated for administering the LEI.
"The fastest way to get LEIs into the world is to re-use an existing infrastructure," says Tim Lind, global head of legal entity and corporate actions, enterprise content, at Thomson Reuters. "A federated model itself will take more time to set up, but we support the FSB recommendations to ensure that the governance is appropriate and that public interests are ultimately served, not the interest of any one commercial entity or anyone who harbors any other ambitions that would be associated with the LEI."
Between now and March 2013, it remains to be seen which providers will end up with designations to administer the LEI, and beyond that, just how a variety of providers in different geographies will form a federated model. What was originally foreseen – a tight and comprehensive combination of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Swift and the Association of National Numbering Agencies (Anna) that was also backed by the industry itself - has given way to something more uncertain.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Lightning strikes: Options boom threatens data overload
Concerns over creaking infrastructure in US options markets are fueling talk of measures to limit the exponential amount of data being generated.
All eyes turn to North America as T+1 arrives
As T+1 settlement becomes a reality in North America, long-lingering questions will get their answers.
Firms worry that lack of ‘explainability’ will be regulatory roadblock for AI
Industry experts share their concerns about advanced AI’s ‘black-box’ nature and how that may attract fragmented regulatory scrutiny.
Caveat creator: GenAI giants’ pledges won’t pre-empt copyright suits
Tech vendors offer indemnities on generative output, but end-users need to check the fine print, warn IP lawyers
Bank-led consortium takes aim at position reporting
Five banks, including Barclays, BNP Paribas, Goldman Sachs and HSBC, have joined forces to mitigate interpretation and implementation errors in position reporting disclosures.
Verafin launches genAI copilot for fincrime investigators
Features include document summarization and improved research tools.
Waters Wrap: Open source and storm clouds on the horizon
Regulators and politicians in America and Europe are increasingly concerned about AI—and, by extension, open-source development. Anthony says there are real reasons for concern.
DSB says industry is ready to meet UPI mandate ahead of deadline
The Unique Product Identifier will be required for certain OTC derivatives in the EU at the end of April, following US adoption in January.
Most read
- IMD & IRD Awards 2024: All the winners
- Best evaluated pricing service provider/vendor—CanDeal Data & Analytics
- Managed services under the spotlight