Sibos: A Good Place To Check ISO 20022 Progress
Another Sibos in the Americas region is upon us, this time in Boston, seven years after it was last held there.
This mammoth securities and payments transaction operations conference, typically held in the largest convention center in its host city, with several streams of panel discussions and an exhibition hall three or four times as large as the Sifma Tech Expo in its best years, is a good place to take the pulse of progress—or lack thereof—on standards relevant to reference data, such as the legal entity identifier and ISO 20022.
Since the last Sibos in the Americas, in Toronto in 2011, there have been significant developments with those standards. At that time, the industry and its regulators were just beginning to define, understand and act upon upgrading ISO 15022 to ISO 20022, to figure out how business identifier codes and trader identifications relate to the LEI, and to contend with risk management rules such as European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR).
It's a little disingenuous to say ISO 20022 only became an issue in 2011, actually. An interesting session planned for this Sibos is one on its first day, slated to cover "10 Years of ISO 20022." Although the ISO 20022 messaging standard, which is being applied to corporate actions operations in the reference data space, was starting to gain greater attention and support in 2011—as evidenced at that year's Sibos, as recently as 2013—there were doubts about its acceptance.
Two years after the Toronto Sibos, many users were still retaining ISO 15022, keeping the transition at a standstill or limiting its progress to the pace of slowly poured molasses.
Representatives of Swift (the messaging standards industry cooperative that organizes Sibos), Citi, Bank of America Merrill Lynch and other industry organizations and interested parties who are scheduled to discuss the decade-long history of ISO 20022, may or may not agree on whether ISO 20022 has produced better results as far as making processing corporate actions more efficient.
As a rule, with regulation and standards that Inside Reference Data covers, none of them are ever complete within a year, and more often than not, are multi-year efforts, first to complete their provisions with universal agreement from regulators and the industry, and then to implement compliance methods and systems. The only certainty for ISO 20022 is that now is a good time, with its ups and downs over the past few years, to make an assessment on its acceptance and effectiveness.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
DSB says industry is ready to meet UPI mandate ahead of deadline
The Unique Product Identifier will be required for certain OTC derivatives in the EU at the end of April, following US adoption in January.
‘Very careful thought’: T+1 will introduce costs, complexities for ETF traders
When the US moves to T+1 at the end of May 2024, firms trading ETFs will need to automate their workflows as much as possible to avoid "settlement misalignment" and additional costs.
Court case probes open-source licenses as movement stands at crossroads
The Software Freedom Conservancy’s lawsuit against TV-maker Vizio begins trial in California, raising questions about open-source licenses and the risks posed by adhering to them.
Waters Wavelength Podcast: Countdown to T+1
DTCC’s Val Wotton joins the podcast this week to discuss the impending move to T+1 in the US.
Consolidated tape hopefuls gear up for uncertain tender process
The bond tapes in the UK and EU are on track to be authorized in 2025. Prospective bidders for the role of provider must choose where to focus their efforts in anticipation of more regulatory clarity on the tender process.
Fighting FAIRR: Inside the bill aiming to keep AI and algos honest
The Financial Artificial Intelligence Risk Reduction Act seeks to fix a market abuse loophole by declaring that AI algorithms do not have brains.
Waters Wrap: The rise of AI washing… and regulation washing?
The SEC recently levied fines against two investment advisors over “AI washing”. Anthony takes issue with the announcement.
Prepare now for the inevitable: T+1 isn’t just a US challenge
The DTCC’s Val Wotton believes that firms around the globe should view North America’s move to T+1 as an opportunity—because it’s inevitable.
Most read
- Deutsche Börse democratizes data with Marketplace offering
- Sell-Side Technology Awards 2024: All the winners
- Sell-Side Technology Awards 2024: Best implementation at a sell-side firm—FlexTrade Systems