Is MiFID II Deadline Delay Justified?
Firms seemingly still have enough time to prepare for January 2017
The apparent delay of the compliance deadline for MiFID II, the European Union's Markets in Financial Instruments Directive regulating investment services, beyond the current January 3, 2017 deadline, raises more questions about the introduction of the rules in the first place.
Was the 2017 deadline set by the European Commission, the EU's regulatory body, realistic? Did it give the industry enough time to meet the requirements of MiFID II, including its associated MiFIR rules and Recommended Technical Standards (RTS), which flesh out the data transparency requirements and ways that data management will be affected by required market infrastructure changes?
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), by all accounts, was lax and late in issuing specific technical guidance—only issuing the aforementioned RTS this September. So it's hard to argue that the industry's apparently successful push to delay the MiFID II deadline for as long as a year, into early 2018, was made because the industry had dragged its feet on the work necessary to comply.
However, with still more than a year before the original 2017 deadline, it is hard to believe that the industry can't get the necessary work done in that amount of time. Certainly a full year delay seems extreme. After all, as Linedata's Matt Gibbs says in sister site Sell-Side Technology's coverage of this issue, his company has already implemented a lot of the necessary changes for electronic trading.
The issues that others cite, such as the need to re-evaluate technology budgets and figure out technology solutions that can work for managing data across multiple regulatory compliance areas, are either "nice-to-haves" or fall outside the realm of actually being prepared to comply. Firms should be doing these things on their own timetable, not trying to bend the deadline on that basis.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Consolidated tape hopefuls gear up for uncertain tender process
The bond tapes in the UK and EU are on track to be authorized in 2025. Prospective bidders for the role of provider must choose where to focus their efforts in anticipation of more regulatory clarity on the tender process.
Fighting FAIRR: Inside the bill aiming to keep AI and algos honest
The Financial Artificial Intelligence Risk Reduction Act seeks to fix a market abuse loophole by declaring that AI algorithms do not have brains.
Waters Wrap: The rise of AI washing… and regulation washing?
The SEC recently levied fines against two investment advisors over “AI washing”. Anthony takes issue with the announcement.
Prepare now for the inevitable: T+1 isn’t just a US challenge
The DTCC’s Val Wotton believes that firms around the globe should view North America’s move to T+1 as an opportunity—because it’s inevitable.
European firms prime for lopsided settlement in North America and at home
With T+1 imminent in North America and increasingly likely to traverse the Atlantic, operations and trading professionals in Europe are fighting on two fronts.
As crypto ETFs become reality, benchmark providers take center stage
The SEC’s approval of the first spot bitcoin ETFs will expose a growing number of traditional market participants to the maturing world of crypto data, a moment that some—such as CF Benchmarks, BlackRock’s benchmark provider—have been eagerly awaiting.
Waters Wavelength Podcast: Looking into the EU regulatory landscape
Eflow’s Ben Parker joins the podcast to discuss EU regulations.
FCA declines to directly regulate market data prices
A year-long investigation by the UK regulator to determine whether competition is hindered in the wholesale data markets has concluded with its decision not to directly regulate much-maligned data pricing and licensing structures.
Most read
- Women in Technology & Data Awards 2024: All the winners and why they won
- Witad Awards 2024: Above and beyond award (vendor)—Susan Bennett, Tradeweb
- Fighting FAIRR: Inside the bill aiming to keep AI and algos honest