ASIC Tightens Automated Trading Controls
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has published its latest report on market structure, in which it has proposed enhanced oversight for automated trading strategies.
Market participants utilizing automated functions in trading will now be required to maintain pre-trade filters, as well as the ability to suspend or limit as required. They will also be mandated to hold increased control over their order entry systems, and to submit their systems for review at least annually.
ASIC expects the new rules to cost current participants for compliance, although it does mention that many firms already have similar processes in place. The rules have come on the back of a disaster at US broker Knight Capital several weeks ago, in which an abberant algorithm lost the company $440 million in a day, requiring it to be bailed out by a consortium of other brokers and market-makers.
"Recent events overseas are a reminder of the speed and automation of markets and the importance of robust controls over those systems," says Belinda Gibson, deputy chair at ASIC. "The enhancements to participant-level controls that ASIC has released for consultation, together with the market-level controls released in June will build confidence in the integrity and cleanliness of our capital markets and facilitate international capital flows. The increasing automation of trading, and ASIC's focus on it, is also evident in our market supervision report, which identified issues from high frequency trading. This type of trading, and algorithms generally, continue to be of concern. The measures we are proposing will strengthen our protection against the type of disruption we have seen recently in other markets."
The new proposals have been foreshadowed since June 2012, when the regulator published Consultation Paper 179. The new paper, 184, titled Australian market structure: Draft market integrity rules and guidance on automated trading, further extends previous mentions and opens the text to comment from market participants until September 2012.
The increasing automation of trading, and ASIC's focus on it, is also evident in our market supervision report, which identified issues from high frequency trading. This type of trading, and algorithms generally, continue to be of concern.
ASIC's review process has been held in tandem with the liberalization of its securities markets. Traditionally dominated by the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), Chi-X Australia was allowed to launch as a competitor last year, prompting a rise in the use of electronic strategies such as those involving the use of algorithms and high-frequency trading.
More on Regulation
Doing a deal? Prioritize info security early
Engaging information security teams early in licensing deals can deliver better results and catch potential issues. Neglecting them can cause delays and disruption, writes Devexperts’ Heetesh Rawal in this op-ed.
SEC pulls rulemaking proposals in bid for course correction
The regulator withdrew 14 Gensler-era proposals, including the controversial predictive data analytics proposal.
Trading venues seen as easiest targets for Esma supervision
Platforms do not pose systemic risks for member states and are already subject to consistent rules.
The Consolidated Audit Trail faces an uncertain fate—yet again
Waters Wrap: The CAT is up and running, but with a conservative SEC in place and renewed pressure from politicians and exchanges, Anthony says the controversial database faces a death by a thousand cuts.
Exchanges plead with SEC to trim CAT reporting requirements
Letters from Cboe, Nasdaq and NYSE ask that the new Atkins administration reduce the amount of data required for the Consolidated Audit Trail, and scrap options data collection entirely.
EU banks want the cloud closer to home amid tariff wars
Fears over US executive orders have prompted new approaches to critical third-party risk management.
Friendly fire? Nasdaq squeezes MTF competitors with steep fee increase
The stock exchange almost tripled the prices of some datasets for multilateral trading facilities, with sources saying the move is the latest effort by exchanges to offset declining trading revenues.
Europe is counting its vendors—and souring on US tech
Under DORA, every financial company with business in the EU must report use of their critical vendors. Deadlines vary, but the message doesn’t: The EU is taking stock of technology dependencies, especially upon US providers.
