Fingers Crossed for a Smooth Ride This Time
For some people, February was a relatively easy month. For others, particularly those running the communications apparatus for the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation, it was less so.
Mandatory reporting, stemming from the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) came into force on February 12, requiring both sides of a derivative transaction to report details of the trade to trade repositories (TRs). It wasn't the smoothest ride, with many complaining about a lack of clarity regarding critical aspects of reporting, such as legal entity identifiers and unique trade identifers (UTIs) being thin on the ground, while problems at some TRs with onboarding delayed it even more.
Indeed, many of those problems still haven't been ironed out. A pathetically small amount of trades (around three percent for listed derivatives) are able to be matched at TRs, for a variety of reasons. Chief among this is the UTI, which can be generated by either side of the trade (although there is really supposed to be agreement) and thus can make lining up each individual report impossible. Some are more prosaic, such as using 'and' instead of ampersands in firm names. Either way, it's clearly a mess.
New Requirements
As such, today's implementation of enhanced reporting requirements inspires little in the way of confidence. Both counterparties are now requred to report the valuation of transactions and the attached collateral, along with the 80-plus fields of the previous requirements. The usual complaints abound about a lack of information, room for interpretation, but is it really the fault of the European Securities and Markets Authority (Esma)?
Not according to Esma, at least, if reports of a bad-tempered meeting in Paris a few weeks ago are any indication. According to journalists on the ground, Esma refused to provide additional clarification, saying that they'd done enough, and that when they issue guidance, they expect it to be followed.
According to journalists on the ground, Esma refused to provide additional clarification, saying that they'd done enough, and that when they issue guidance, they expect it to be followed.
Ouch.
It is a sign of a shift in attitude however, from accommodation through to frustration. Some regulators I speak to have sympathy with the industry, and say that they understand the technological struggle that things such as reporting involve. Others are less empathic, citing a streak of intransigence within the industry, and hearing the same arguments every time a rule is introduced.
Either way, reporting is here to stay. And while some home authorities such as the UK's Financial Conduct Authority have been notoriously lenient with firms to date, people shouldn't expect their patience to be limitless, either.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
New equity trading protocols want traders to show their hand
A new generation of trading venues has emerged with the goal of unlocking liquidity and improving the efficiency of trades.
ForecastEx, event contracts, and a new way to think about markets
Waters Wrap: Anthony speaks with the former CEO of OneChicago David Downey about his new venture and the future of prediction markets.
Interop after acquisitions remains daunting for buyers
Executives from a variety of vendors speaking at WFIC explained why desktop interoperability is important and why progress has been slow.
Should banks risk lightning hitting twice for CrowdStrike?
Bank tech teams divided on whether to give security vendor a second chance after update crash.
Northern Trust adds fixed-income capabilities for outsourced trading in Asia-Pacific
The custodian bank now offers 24/6 fixed-income trading coverage with desks in Chicago, London, and Sydney.
South Africa’s equity markets court HFTs with tech upgrades
Competition for flow has driven innovation in connectivity, risk, and data provision.
Dealer relief at delays to Refinitiv Matching’s tech migration
First phase of replatforming for Swiss spot pairs set to be pushed to mid-2025.
Kepler Cheuvreux builds proprietary execution platform with Adaptive
The broker wants to move away from third-party technologies as DORA’s risk management requirements could make vendor relationships more cumbersome.