Max Bowie: A Facelift for Fundamentals?
Max says firms are seeking a new edge by turning to older and slower datasets, delivered in new ways.
There’s something akin to the “slow food movement” going on in the capital markets.
For the past decade, most cutting-edge technical innovation in the market data industry has primarily been around the pursuit of low latency—in some cases, to the detriment of the development of other fundamental datasets that might arguably have delivered better long-term returns. But as it has become harder and more expensive to compete in the latency race, firms have begun looking for other sources of insight. As a result, the models by which datasets such as old-school fundamental research are produced and distributed are getting a facelift.
Years ago, Multex (now part of Thomson Reuters) revolutionized the delivery of broker research by providing access through a single portal. Then vendors such as Alacra pioneered the concept of online marketplaces for non–real-time premium content, while UK-based software consultancy Worldflow took this a step further with research apps and mobile access to research, responding to the emergence of wireless tablet devices that made research consumption feasible via mobile devices.
More recently, a new generation of content providers have begun bringing completely new approaches to the generation of old-style content. For example, New York-based Estimize—which recently sold a 10 percent stake in its business to Euromoney Institutional Investor—has brought crowd-sourcing to the earnings estimates space, and is consistently proving more accurate than consensus Wall Street estimates. Meanwhile, vendors such as Nous and Invstr are creating new sources of price forecasts by persuading retail investors to contribute their predictions through trading game apps.
A Step Further
London-based crowd-sourced investment platform StockViews is now taking research to a new level with a series of new initiatives: First, the vendor—which is now starting to charge fees to access its platform—is improving real-time tracking of the research and recommendations on StockViews, adding a social media-style immediate feedback element to the research and analyst rating capabilities of the platform.
In addition, StockViews is not limiting clients’ research choices to established firms or individual analysts, but is introducing features that allow users to search for analysts by their area of specialty or based on specific expertise, and the ability for users to pitch specific research projects and find the best-placed analysts with the most relevant experience to produce the research, essentially creating not just an online marketplace for research, but an interactive venue for custom content creation.
Once you have these “traditional” datasets in a new format, you can utilize them in different ways, such as how New York-based AnalytixInsight is leveraging its database of research generated from fundamental company data and other metrics to create actionable indicators that firms can directly incorporate into trading strategies, in response to increased use of its CapitalCube platform by buy-side firms.
The upshot of all this is that, in my opinion, greater importance will be placed going forward on well-established types of data, although it will be created and delivered in new ways, leaving vendors such as those described above well-placed to deliver unique sources of alpha. Meanwhile, to extract value, search tools—such as those from search providers like 9W Search and AlphaSense—will become critical to finding the right piece of data. Once users have the right data, they can turn to analytics providers to correlate it with other datasets, or store it for future use. And to bring these capabilities and content sets together, look perhaps not to traditional vendor aggregators, but to on-demand platform providers such as Xignite and others, who can create professional-level portals using web services and widgets.
All this is technologically possible. Now all we need are commercial models that make it economically feasible so that the providers can make money while consumers save it.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
AI & data enablement: A looming reality or pipe dream?
Waters Wrap: The promise of AI and agents is massive, and real-world success stories are trickling out. But Anthony notes that firms still need to be hyper-focused on getting the data foundation correct before adding layers.
Data managers worry lack of funding, staffing will hinder AI ambitions
Nearly two-thirds of respondents to WatersTechnology’s data benchmark survey rated the pressure they’re receiving from senior executives and the board as very high. But is the money flowing for talent and data management?
Data standardization is the ‘trust accelerator’ for broader AI adoption
In this guest column, data product managers at Fitch Solutions explain AI’s impact on credit and investment risk management.
As AI pressures mount, banks split on how to handle staffing
Benchmarking: Over the next 12 months, almost a third of G-Sib respondents said they plan to decrease headcount in their data function.
Everyone wants to tokenize the assets. What about the data?
The IMD Wrap: With exchanges moving market data on-chain, Wei-Shen believes there’s a need to standardize licensing agreements.
FIX Trading Community recommends data practices for European CTs
The industry association has published practices and workflows using FIX messaging standards for the upcoming EU consolidated tapes.
TCB Data-Broadhead pairing highlights challenges of market data management
Waters Wrap: The vendors are hoping that blending TCB’s reporting infrastructure with Broadhead’s DLT-backed digital contract and auditing engine will be the cure for data rights management.
CME, LSEG align on market data licensing in GenAI era
The two major exchanges say they are licensing the use case—not the technology.