Aggelos is encouraged by the burgeoning growth of socially responsible technologies within the capital markets, but says there is still a lot more work for vendors and financial firms to do.
I am going to take you to an ideal world, where investors, bankers, and asset managers, et al, are all human rights advocates. While I don’t expect anyone to be transformed into a Mother Theresa-type figure anytime soon, I am perhaps naïve enough to believe that something is slowly changing in the way people do business.
I’ve noticed an underlying tendency among fintech firms to raise social awareness within the corporate world by offering a number of social responsibility-oriented services. This trend is being driven by a developing interest from their clients at a tumultuous time when solidarity is severely tested.
In September, Thomson Reuters launched the first Diversity and Inclusion Index (D&I) running on its Eikon platform. The index presents the top 100 publicly traded companies with the most diverse and inclusive workplaces.
This move came as more than 1,400 investors globally have already signed the United Nations’ Principles for Responsible Investment. Speaking to Debra Walton, global managing director, customer propositions at Thomson Reuters, I got proof to support my hunch that social responsibility has indeed become an investment strategy.
Walton said that diversity and inclusion have become a performance issue since it is now proven that companies with a diverse workforce have, over a period of five years, produced better returns on equity, stronger operating profit margins and better dividend yields, as well as lower beta.
I am perhaps naïve enough to believe that something is slowly changing in the way people do business.
“Looking at environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors can help give the investor insights into company management and culture, which could not otherwise be detected using financial measures,” said Walton. “We see an opportunity for focused or ‘thematic’ sustainable investment products that can also provide competitive returns.”
The Luxembourg Stock Exchange (LuxSE) unveiled the world’s first “green exchange” in October, a platform where investors can contribute to the fight against climate change or support other green projects and initiatives. To date, the exchange hosts more than 116 green securities with a total value of $45 billion.
According to the LuxSE, interest has been more than satisfying, despite strict rules. A security listed on the exchange is automatically disqualified if it falls into certain categories, such as nuclear production, animal testing for non-medical products, medical testing on endangered species, or if it’s classified as a fossil fuel.
Reading through the press coverage on the exchange, I stumbled on an opinion article arguing that investing in the environment is an easy win since the political implications are minimal. As a political argument, that might be correct, but the author completely ignored the fact that renewable energy and especially wind and solar power, is one of the most popular energy investments right now.
Social responsibility is the central theme of US-based software provider Impact Labs. In September, it announced the launch of the first algorithmic portfolio software solely for those who actively adopt ESG investing.
By definition, users are not allowed to buy or sell securities by weapons manufacturers or other organizations related to violence and war. However, they’re free to trade thematically. For example, if someone cares about LGBTQ rights or the humanitarian crisis in Yemen, then they could choose to trade blocks of shares from different companies and organizations that the algorithm deems relevant.
The mastermind behind this software is Jason R. Escamilla, who has an extensive history in investment management. He says the financial community is more than open to walk down that path and spread investments throughout social projects.
The question now is how much of this “ideal world” will be integrated to everyday practices. The turning point will be when fintech firms understand that they have a lot to gain by offering the most relevant products in the market, while convincing investment firms to follow suit and adopt them.
Dan and Anthony talk about how technologists—and traders—are portrayed in TV and on the big screen, and just how accurate those portrayals are.Subscribe to Weekly Wrap emails