Opening Cross: From Startups and Dust-ups to Markups, Shakedowns and Breakdowns

Last week, I suggested that 2013 will be the year of the startup. This week, we bring you news of another new startup, Quandl, along with updates on recent startups MarketPsych and YCharts, and a stark comparison of the challenge faced by any startup seeking to compete with—or become one of—the “big” vendors, courtesy of Burton-Taylor International Consulting, in a preview of its upcoming report on the state of the data industry.
In the heavyweight ring, Bloomberg and Thomson Reuters are still slugging it out for market leadership, with Bloomberg landing some solid blows to win the 2012 round, seemingly bucking the overall trend of declines in desktop positions, though Thomson Reuters’ bulk and endurance, together with its new Eikon terminal, means the vendor is likely to come out swinging undaunted in round 2013.
The middleweight championship is proving more competitive, with Interactive Data coming under attack from fast-growing challengers such as FactSet Research Systems and Morningstar. And that’s not even counting S&P Capital IQ—which president Lou Eccleston likes to refer to as a “billion-dollar startup”—or financial technology giant SunGard, which last week acquired corporate actions processing software vendor XSP.
Interactive Data and Morningstar have also both grown through acquisition, but have a long way to go to rival the market shares of Thomson Reuters and Bloomberg. However, just as 2013 may prove to be the year of the startup, it may also be a year of acquisitions as established players in search of differentiating features look for novel datasets and technologies being developed by much smaller and younger companies.
One venture that has flourished after being bought by a bigger company is low-latency infrastructure provider MarketPrizm—originally created by the IT arm of alternative marketplace Chi-X, and sold to Colt Telecom in 2011. The vendor’s most recent deal is to supply Japanese trading platform SBI Japannext with prices from other exchanges for its own price formation and best execution purposes.
Yet the main challenge of this process is not capturing the data, but rather how it is used to create prices—as BATS Global Markets recently discovered, prompting the admission last week that a glitch had resulted in circumstances where short sale trades could be executed at or for less than the national best bid, while hidden orders could execute against peg orders being re-priced in response to a move in the NBBO. In news reports since, BATS has blamed the rising complexity of the US stock markets as a contributing factor to the incidents—though it should be noted that the exchange identified and owned up to the problem, and envisages a quick fix, whereas if similar problems were created by market participants themselves, identifying and fixing them could be a lengthy and fragmented process. This opens the door for hosted services to help firms meet their regulatory requirements: It’s true that the market is becoming more complex, and the fact is that regulation must become more complex as a result. Hence, for certain compliance functions, it makes more sense to have them performed centrally than separately by each firm, with everybody taking a different approach to achieve the same ends. Performing what you can at the doorstep of the marketplace itself—a regulatory “bouncer,” if you will—may not result in the most efficient execution environment, but it might just create the most compliant environment, and might also prevent party-flash-crashers from gaining entry.
With some traditional defense and military manufacturers predicting that their biggest areas in future may be cyber-security rather than battleships and bayonets, those involved in the centralization and aggregation of liquidity and data—i.e. marketplaces and vendors—may find their own business models evolving to create revenue lines from the very regulatory changes that many are now so wary of. Or perhaps this would be an area ripe for an enterprising startup?
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Emerging Technologies
BlueMatrix acquires FactSet’s RMS Partners platform
This is the third acquisition BlueMatrix has made this year.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 331: Cresting Wave’s Bill Murphy
Bill Murphy, Blackstone’s former CTO, joins to discuss that much-discussed MIT study on AI projects failing and factors executives should consider as the technology continues to evolves.
FactSet adds MarketAxess CP+ data, LSEG files dismissal, BNY’s new AI lab, and more
The Waters Cooler: Synthetic data for LLM training, Dora confusion, GenAI’s ‘blind spots,’ and our 9/11 remembrance in this week’s news roundup.
Chief investment officers persist with GenAI tools despite ‘blind spots’
Trading heads from JP Morgan, UBS, and M&G Investments explained why their firms were bullish on GenAI, even as “replicability and reproducibility” challenges persist.
Wall Street hesitates on synthetic data as AI push gathers steam
Deutsche Bank and JP Morgan have differing opinions on the use of synthetic data to train LLMs.
A Q&A with H2O’s tech chief on reducing GenAI noise
Timothée Consigny says the key to GenAI experimentation rests in leveraging the expertise of portfolio managers “to curate smaller and more relevant datasets.”
Etrading wins UK bond tape, R3 debuts new lab, TNS buys Radianz, and more
The Waters Cooler: The Swiss release an LLM, overnight trading strays further from reach, and the private markets frenzy continues in this week’s news roundup.
AI fails for many reasons but succeeds for few
Firms hoping to achieve ROI on their AI efforts must focus on data, partnerships, and scale—but a fundamental roadblock remains.