Fatca's Endgame
In past columns, I tracked the progress of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (Fatca) regulation from when US regulators first set out on their effort to collect withholding tax from foreign holdings by US entities, through efforts to institute compliance plans.
With the new postponed compliance date of July 1 fast-approaching, the industry is looking at a two-part endgame. The first piece is getting the last parts of guidance from the US Internal Revenue Service on all the details of what Fatca requires, including details of the W-8BEN-E form firms will have to file under the Act. The second part is getting data management technology up and running and ready in time for the looming deadline.
At Inside Reference Data's March 18 breakfast event covering Fatca developments, sponsored by SIX Financial Information, Dax Philbert, global Fatca loans program manager at Deutsche Bank, advanced the idea of a "Fatca hub" that gathers the necessary data and distributes it to different groups within a firm.
Workarounds may be necessary, Philbert said. "Then have a phase two or plan B that will get you the future phase [of a complete Fatca system]," he explained. The global landscape is one that includes markets with stricter privacy regimens, such as Saudi Arabia, Dubai, Hong Kong, Singapore, Luxembourg and some other Middle Eastern and North African markets. The "Fatca hub" concept could be a way to cope with varied levels of privacy rules.
"You have to think systematically about how you address sharing of information, manage the business effectively and also have consistency in your processes," Philbert cautioned.
Before anyone can advance theories on how to structure or change data management operations concerning Fatca filings and information, however, there appear to be a lot of unanswered questions about Fatca requirements—more than just the nature of the "W-8BEN-E" form, said Jon Watts, director and head of banking and securities, Fatca, at Deloitte & Touche, who gave a keynote address at the event.
Numerous intergovernmental agreements (IGAs) between the US and other countries are now in place, but standards bodies, especially in Europe, may emerge to tie together the various IGAs and provide consistency, according to Watts. He sees this development and other uncertainties about Fatca rule information needing three or maybe even five years to achieve that consistency.
Undoubtedly, there will be "a lot of noise" after July 1, said Watts, "because a lot of companies have thought about [Fatca] for a long time but have only just started the process of reaching out to customers." That will also become evident in the need to figure out whether firms need only collect documentation for compliance or remediate their processes completely, as Watts sees it.
Beyond July 1, a February 2015 deadline also must be adhered to, for getting reporting processes and customer remediation set up. What will occur if the IRS or US Treasury should decide that Fatca does not go far enough and other requirements should be added to the purview of Fatca? That could further confuse anyone trying to do their level best to be ready, both on July 1 and for the latter deadline about a year away.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
DSB says industry is ready to meet UPI mandate ahead of deadline
The Unique Product Identifier will be required for certain OTC derivatives in the EU at the end of April, following US adoption in January.
‘Very careful thought’: T+1 will introduce costs, complexities for ETF traders
When the US moves to T+1 at the end of May 2024, firms trading ETFs will need to automate their workflows as much as possible to avoid "settlement misalignment" and additional costs.
Court case probes open-source licenses as movement stands at crossroads
The Software Freedom Conservancy’s lawsuit against TV-maker Vizio begins trial in California, raising questions about open-source licenses and the risks posed by adhering to them.
Waters Wavelength Podcast: Countdown to T+1
DTCC’s Val Wotton joins the podcast this week to discuss the impending move to T+1 in the US.
Consolidated tape hopefuls gear up for uncertain tender process
The bond tapes in the UK and EU are on track to be authorized in 2025. Prospective bidders for the role of provider must choose where to focus their efforts in anticipation of more regulatory clarity on the tender process.
Fighting FAIRR: Inside the bill aiming to keep AI and algos honest
The Financial Artificial Intelligence Risk Reduction Act seeks to fix a market abuse loophole by declaring that AI algorithms do not have brains.
Waters Wrap: The rise of AI washing… and regulation washing?
The SEC recently levied fines against two investment advisors over “AI washing”. Anthony takes issue with the announcement.
Prepare now for the inevitable: T+1 isn’t just a US challenge
The DTCC’s Val Wotton believes that firms around the globe should view North America’s move to T+1 as an opportunity—because it’s inevitable.
Most read
- Sell-Side Technology Awards 2024: All the winners
- Systematic tools gain favor in fixed income
- Sell-Side Technology Awards 2024: Best sell-side front-office platform—Bloomberg