Elon Musk's prediction of humans having to adapt and merge with advanced artificial intelligence paints a dark picture of the future of human existence.
Speculation about the impact of artificial intelligence is a near daily occurrence, which means it’s hard for someone to truly move the needle when they make some type of prediction regarding the technology. However, there are a handful of people who will always be able to grab the public’s attention when discussing innovative technology and how it will affect our future.
On the top of that list is Elon Musk. When the co-founder of Tesla speaks, people listen. It seems every public speech Musk makes is followed shortly thereafter by a plethora of headlines about his latest proclamation. There is even a site dedicated to “Shit Elon Says,” which also doubles as its URL.
AI Is Coming
While I like to poke fun at Musk, I understand he’s a smart guy. He has probably forgotten twice as much information as I’ve learned in my lifetime. Yet something he said while speaking at the World Government Summit in Dubai this week made me raise my eyebrows, which isn’t an easy thing to do if you’ve seen my headshot.
As first reported by CNBC, Musk spoke about the future of artificial intelligence and its relationship with humans as it continues to improve.
“Over time I think we will probably see a closer merger of biological intelligence and digital intelligence,” Musk said.
There have been plenty of television shows and movies that have predicted humans’ integration with technology, resulting in some kind of cyborg. However, they are just that: movies and television shows. How practical is it that humans will need to evolve to the point where they actually merge with AI technology?
It is worth nothing Musk didn’t say this trend will start tomorrow. He said the first big disruption the technology will cause for humans is around autonomous cars, a point many would agree with. Still, envisioning a world where humans and AI need to be intertwined seems like a bit of a reach, even in the distant future.
Musk’s explanation of how this might work, according to the story, is a bit vague.
“Some high-bandwidth interface to the brain will be something that helps achieve a symbiosis between human and machine intelligence and maybe solves the control problem and the usefulness problem,” said Musk.
To be honest, I’m not quite sure what he means by this. Are we talking about sending waves directly to the human brain that will allow it to operate like a computer and process information quickly? I have no idea how practical that type of technology is, but it at least seems plausible compared to actually implementing hardware into someone’s brain, which is the other way you could interpret that quote.
Call me old fashioned, but I’m not interested in having a computer chip plugged directly into my brain. What happens if the hardware needs to be replaced? What if there is a bug in the software? What if it gets hacked?
Granted, if you went back in time 100 years and told someone about the technology innovations we have today, you’d probably elicit a similar reaction of disbelief from them. But something about actually putting the technology inside someone’s brain seems like a bridge too far.
Like I said before, it’s not like Musk is saying we’re going to start creating this super race of half-human, half-AI people starting tomorrow. In fact, if I were a betting man, I’d say it’s later rather than sooner. Artificial intelligence has made some massive strides in recent years, but we’ve still got a long way to go. Look no further than Microsoft’s recent AI project “Tay.”
The company launched a Twitter account back in March 2016 that was meant to interact with 18- to 24-year-olds and learn from its conversations with users. It only took a day for it to start tweeting racist statements before being shut down. And while it seemed like the account was intentionally targeted, the fact remains it’s not the type of technology one would probably want in their brains.
Still, if you’re the owner of an auto plant that has a group of workers looking to unionize right before you have plans to scale up your operations, implementing a chip in people’s heads that can be programmed might not seem like a bad idea.
IBM makes headway with blockchain and encryption services; the FCA's Stephen Hanks says firms need to make decisions about their ARMs and APA providers soon.Subscribe to Weekly Wrap emails