February 2011: Time to Get with the Program

There are two types of technology vendors currently operating in the financial services industry: those that have come to the realization that their primary raison d’etre is service and not technology. And there are those that have not.
This argument might sound a bit counterintuitive, but upon closer scrutiny, its logic is difficult to unpick. And here’s why: Technology in the financial services industry has, by and large, become commoditized, to the extent that it no longer guarantees vendors a competitive advantage. Sure, it’s required to enter the game, but it won’t, by itself, win you customers.
Closely coupled with this notion is the growing realization that end-users’ consumer habits have changed over the last decade. Firms are now driven by factors other than purely functional ones when it comes to arriving at their purchasing decisions. Clearly, price is one factor, but it’s not the most important—not by a long shot. The single most important factor driving “buy” decisions is the level of service offered by the vendor. But, it seems, not everyone gets this.
When you factor in the incestuous nature of the various constituents that collectively constitute the financial services industry, only then do you get an inkling of how influential the information is that is passed between market participants, based primarily on the levels of service they have experienced through their vendor relationships.
In short, people talk, and, as a technology vendor, you do not want them talking about your poor levels of service, regardless of how good your underlying technology might be. Conversely, if you’re able to develop a reputation for delivering on your promises—especially when it comes to implementations—being amenable, approachable and generally easy to live with, you can probably lay off your entire marketing department secure in the knowledge that your happy clients will do a more-than-acceptable job of managing your marketing functions for you.
And yet there are still an appreciable number of Luddite-esque technology vendors that assume their products alone will guarantee their future. It did in the past, right? Yes, that may be, but the 2011 operating environment is so far removed from that of four years ago, that comparisons between the two are pointless. Most technology vendors acknowledge this fact, but for those that haven’t, maybe they will finally board the service train this year.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
Academic warns of systemic risk from AI-powered trading
Strategies generated by LLMs exhibit “very strange, correlated trading behavior”, says Lopez Lira.
The Model Context Protocol brings agents to life—along with risk
Waters Wrap: From chat to infrastructure modernization, Anthropic’s MCP offers a ‘bridge’ to agentic AI, but its early days may prove disillusioning.
NZX outlines plans to bolster fast-growing dark pool
Since launching one year ago, NZX’s dark book has 5.5% of the exchange’s total turnover, and price improvement per trade on average is 11 basis points, but the exchange has more in store.
Agentic AI comes to Bloomberg Terminal via Anthropic protocol
The data giant’s ubiquitous terminal has been slowly opening up for years, but its latest enhancement represents a forward leap in what CTO Shawn Edwards calls, “the way we should talk to the world.”
M&G Investments braves cost headwinds in pursuit of AI
The UK asset manager’s AI ambitions started with the creation of a data lake to ensure high-quality data is being fed into models.
Asic probe piles pressure on ASX to deliver Chess replacement
But market insiders think late intervention by regulators could even slow down implementation.
Stakes raised for UK bond, EU derivatives tapes after Ediphy clinches win
The pressure is on for TransFICC, Etrading, Finbourne, and Propellant Digital, who are still vying to provide the UK’s fixed income consolidated tape after Esma awarded the EU’s tape to Ediphy and its partners.
Exchange M&A, US moratorium on AI regs dashed, Citi’s “fat-finger”-killer, and more
The Waters Cooler: Euronext-Athex, SIX-Aquis, Blue Ocean-Eventus, EDM Association, and more in this week’s news roundup.