Regulation special report

Click here to download the PDF
A Never-Ending Story
Complying with new regulations governing how the financial services industry works tends to be pretty costly. I remember moderating the CIOs' panel discussion at our Waters USA event in New York back in December 2010, where I asked the panel members-Peter Kelso, CIO, Deutsche Asset Management; Michael Radziemski, CIO, Lord Abbett and Co.; Scott Marcar, global head of risk and finance technology, RBS; Peter Richards, CTO, JPMorgan; and Drew Vaden, CIO, Nomura Holdings-to estimate how much of the following year's IT budget would be swallowed up by compliance and regulatory spending. The consensus was startling: All the panelists estimated that spending in this area would account for between 30 and 40 percent of their overall 2011 budgets, although they weren't prepared to drill down into the figures to provide a more transparent breakdown of exactly what was being allocated to which area of compliance and regulatory spending.
At the CIOs' panel discussion at the recently held Buy-Side Technology European summit in London, I posed that same question to the four panelists-Chris Sims, CTO, Ignis Asset Management; Simon Lumsdon, CTO, Bluebay Asset Management; Julian Hingorani, CTO, UBS Global Asset Management; and Neil Panchen, CTO, Altana Wealth. I was surprised to hear that their spending forecastswere far more modest-in the region of 10 percent of their total IT budgets. These two examples illustrate the extent to which regulatory and compliance spending differ from firm to firm, even though their regulatory requirements are broadly similar.
Much has been made of the role played by data-the stuff that makes the capital markets world go round-when it comes to regulation and compliance, a phenomenon covered in detail by the Q&A section of this special report that starts on page four. In many respects, a firm's ability to provide evidence of its compliance to regulatory bodies across a range of business activities is largely contingent on the efficacy of its data management processes and governance. In this respect, the greatest challenge facing both buy-side and sell-side firms is not so much generating and storing the requisite data, but rather producing it on demand, in the right format, in a reasonable time period. And that boils down to sound data management, a never-ending story across the capital markets, if ever there was one.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Doing a deal? Prioritize info security early
Engaging information security teams early in licensing deals can deliver better results and catch potential issues. Neglecting them can cause delays and disruption, writes Devexperts’ Heetesh Rawal in this op-ed.
SEC pulls rulemaking proposals in bid for course correction
The regulator withdrew 14 Gensler-era proposals, including the controversial predictive data analytics proposal.
Trading venues seen as easiest targets for Esma supervision
Platforms do not pose systemic risks for member states and are already subject to consistent rules.
The Consolidated Audit Trail faces an uncertain fate—yet again
Waters Wrap: The CAT is up and running, but with a conservative SEC in place and renewed pressure from politicians and exchanges, Anthony says the controversial database faces a death by a thousand cuts.
Exchanges plead with SEC to trim CAT reporting requirements
Letters from Cboe, Nasdaq and NYSE ask that the new Atkins administration reduce the amount of data required for the Consolidated Audit Trail, and scrap options data collection entirely.
EU banks want the cloud closer to home amid tariff wars
Fears over US executive orders have prompted new approaches to critical third-party risk management.
Friendly fire? Nasdaq squeezes MTF competitors with steep fee increase
The stock exchange almost tripled the prices of some datasets for multilateral trading facilities, with sources saying the move is the latest effort by exchanges to offset declining trading revenues.
Europe is counting its vendors—and souring on US tech
Under DORA, every financial company with business in the EU must report use of their critical vendors. Deadlines vary, but the message doesn’t: The EU is taking stock of technology dependencies, especially upon US providers.