Suing the Lawmakers: Deutsche Börse Takes on Brussels
One of the more eye-catching headlines this week is that Deutsche Börse will begin proceedings against the European Commission for blocking its proposed merger with NYSE Euronext.
The exchange says—perhaps fairly—that it disagrees with several aspects of the ruling, although it declines to say which ones. The smart money is on the definition of derivatives markets, specifically the exclusion of over-the-counter (OTC) trades from the decision that the combined entity would have a quasi-monopolistic hold over European activity in these areas. Competition from non-European exchanges was also dismissed, which Deutsche Börse says is unfair. In a press conference shortly after the ruling was made, CEO Reto Francioni said the decision marked a "black day" for Europe.
Lone Ranger
Interestingly, NYSE Euronext isn't taking part in the litigation, leaving Deutsche Börse to go it alone against the Commission. A spokesman says it has not yet decided what course of action to take. Reading between the lines, the implication is that NYSE wants to leave this episode behind and move on.
It is unclear whether Deutsche Börse’s move is more of a publicity stunt or an attempt to recoup some losses from the deal rather than a genuine attempt to change the decision. The Commission has said that it stands by its decision, and will defend it in court if necessary.
Litigating Legislation
This isn't the first instance of a governmental body being sued over financial services-sector decisions of late, either. In July 2011, a US federal court struck down the Securities Exchange Commission's (SEC’s) proxy rule after a challenge from industry groups. In December 2011, the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (Sifma) and the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) filed a lawsuit against the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) regarding its position limits rules.
Competition commissions for corporate mergers and wholesale regulatory reform are different beasts, of course, but this new wave of litigious sentiment toward legislative bodies is interesting. Does it signal a shift in approach from backroom lobbying and continuous ex-parte meetings with regulators and comment letters, to discussions in court? Only time will tell, but I find it unlikely. Influencing legislation is one thing; butting heads with it is quite another, and the cards are usually stacked in the house’s favor, in these instances. Even the more controversial aspects of macro regulation, such as the Volcker Rule, are more likely to cause mass grumbling than outright court orders.
That being said, it's always a possibility. But provoking supreme authorities and, as CFTC Commissioner Bart Chilton famously said, “dancing on the head of a legal pin,” carries its own risks.
If anyone would like to discuss regulatory challenges, please feel free to call me on +44 207 316 9811 or e-mail me on james.rundle@incisivemedia.com.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Bank-led consortium takes aim at position reporting
Five banks, including Barclays, BNP Paribas, Goldman Sachs and HSBC, have joined forces to mitigate interpretation and implementation errors in position reporting disclosures.
Verafin launches genAI copilot for fincrime investigators
Features include document summarization and improved research tools.
Waters Wrap: Open source and storm clouds on the horizon
Regulators and politicians in America and Europe are increasingly concerned about AI—and, by extension, open-source development. Anthony says there are real reasons for concern.
DSB says industry is ready to meet UPI mandate ahead of deadline
The Unique Product Identifier will be required for certain OTC derivatives in the EU at the end of April, following US adoption in January.
‘Very careful thought’: T+1 will introduce costs, complexities for ETF traders
When the US moves to T+1 at the end of May 2024, firms trading ETFs will need to automate their workflows as much as possible to avoid "settlement misalignment" and additional costs.
Court case probes open-source licenses as movement stands at crossroads
The Software Freedom Conservancy’s lawsuit against TV-maker Vizio begins trial in California, raising questions about open-source licenses and the risks posed by adhering to them.
Waters Wavelength Podcast: Countdown to T+1
DTCC’s Val Wotton joins the podcast this week to discuss the impending move to T+1 in the US.
Consolidated tape hopefuls gear up for uncertain tender process
The bond tapes in the UK and EU are on track to be authorized in 2025. Prospective bidders for the role of provider must choose where to focus their efforts in anticipation of more regulatory clarity on the tender process.
Most read
- Chris Edmonds takes the reins at ICE Fixed Income and Data Services
- FactSet looks to build on portfolio commentary with AI
- DTCC urges affirmation focus ahead of T+1 move