Data as Regulatory Inoculation
Editor's View
In sessions at Waters USA earlier this week about budgeting for IT with new regulation in mind, and about the use of enterprise infrastructure for consistent pricing and risk analytics, the financial industry's concerns about regulators seemed a bit premature considering the issues with data management still to be addressed or solved.
Compliance with the US Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act is easily achievable, said Scott Condron, managing director and chief technology officer at BlackRock, who spoke in the budgeting session. Yet Condron put forward the idea that market regulation overall is what will restrict the ability of individual investors to access and benefit from capital markets. "The ability to have product that meets their income needs is being restricted by regulations crafted by people who do not understand capital markets, market structure and access to liquidity – and what actually represents best execution or fairness," he said.
No matter what the regulation or rules that still come out of the Dodd-Frank Act (Condron pointed to 325 rules yet to be written to codify the law), inevitably more regulation will mean a greater level of supervision and transparency can be expected, said Satyam Kancharla, senior vice-president of client solutions at pricing and risk analytics provider Numerix, who spoke about pricing and risk analysis in enterprise infrastructure.
So the securities industry ought to be able to track its trading and identification data with a precision equal to Wal-Mart's capability in tracking inventory throughout its distribution from producers to its stores, according to Kancharla. "The industry in general... is typically siloed by business and asset class," he said. "All these stakeholders have various ways of accessing these systems. Analytics are split into islands that live in these different silos."
This fragmentation contributes to the industry's difficulty in tracking data, and by extension, centralizing analytics, explained Kancharla. "We need to know exactly what our positions are and exactly what our exposures are at any time of day," he said.
With this not yet accomplished, can industry professionals be considered credible in critiquing the knowledge of regulators? Without an accurate, centralized organization and handling of data to support or pave the way for centralized analytics, how does the industry claim proper supervision of the trading in question, and transparency to investors as well as regulators? If these questions are answered, and data management is on target, then the industry has an unassailable case that it accurately and fairly serves investors.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Bank-led consortium takes aim at position reporting
Five banks, including Barclays, BNP Paribas, Goldman Sachs and HSBC, have joined forces to mitigate interpretation and implementation errors in position reporting disclosures.
Verafin launches genAI copilot for fincrime investigators
Features include document summarization and improved research tools.
Waters Wrap: Open source and storm clouds on the horizon
Regulators and politicians in America and Europe are increasingly concerned about AI—and, by extension, open-source development. Anthony says there are real reasons for concern.
DSB says industry is ready to meet UPI mandate ahead of deadline
The Unique Product Identifier will be required for certain OTC derivatives in the EU at the end of April, following US adoption in January.
‘Very careful thought’: T+1 will introduce costs, complexities for ETF traders
When the US moves to T+1 at the end of May 2024, firms trading ETFs will need to automate their workflows as much as possible to avoid "settlement misalignment" and additional costs.
Court case probes open-source licenses as movement stands at crossroads
The Software Freedom Conservancy’s lawsuit against TV-maker Vizio begins trial in California, raising questions about open-source licenses and the risks posed by adhering to them.
Waters Wavelength Podcast: Countdown to T+1
DTCC’s Val Wotton joins the podcast this week to discuss the impending move to T+1 in the US.
Consolidated tape hopefuls gear up for uncertain tender process
The bond tapes in the UK and EU are on track to be authorized in 2025. Prospective bidders for the role of provider must choose where to focus their efforts in anticipation of more regulatory clarity on the tender process.
Most read
- Waters Wavelength Podcast: S&P’s CTO on AI, data, and the future of datacenters
- Chris Edmonds takes the reins at ICE Fixed Income and Data Services
- Waters Wrap: GenAI and rising tides