Reference Data Utility on the WFIC Agenda
Bi-annual conference promises insight into where the proposed SPReD utility may take data management

At the tail-end of the summer, the Securities Product Reference Data utility (SPReD) became a hot topic. Its reported backers, JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs, were not the ones doing the talking, however, as no official announcement of the service was made, nor had one been made through today, October 2.
Nevertheless, some other major industry firms will be speaking more generally about the prospect of a reference data utility (RDU) like SPReD at next week's World Financial Information Conference (WFIC) in New Orleans, organized by the FISD industry association, which addresses data, trading and regulatory compliance issues of concern. Representatives of the Intercontinental Exchange, State Street and Dun & Bradstreet are scheduled to share thoughts on how data providers can fit into an RDU format, among other questions.
In a column shortly after the original news of plans for SPReD surfaced, I called the venture an effort by the sell side to recoup control of data management and processes. Part of the planned discussion at WFIC is expected to explore the differences between how the buy side and the sell side view SPReD or any other RDU.
An interesting question for such a discussion is how the benefits that the sell side—and SPReD's backers in particular—may reap from its use could trickle down or flow over to the buy side. Would sell-side firms' greater efficiency and command of reference data make for more accurate market information and dealings, which buy-side firms and funds would then be able to leverage? This could be something to follow, presuming plans for SPReD are soon finalized by its backers with SmartStream, the data services company whose Reference Data Utility service is slated to be SPReD's engine.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Doing a deal? Prioritize info security early
Engaging information security teams early in licensing deals can deliver better results and catch potential issues. Neglecting them can cause delays and disruption, writes Devexperts’ Heetesh Rawal in this op-ed.
SEC pulls rulemaking proposals in bid for course correction
The regulator withdrew 14 Gensler-era proposals, including the controversial predictive data analytics proposal.
Trading venues seen as easiest targets for Esma supervision
Platforms do not pose systemic risks for member states and are already subject to consistent rules.
The Consolidated Audit Trail faces an uncertain fate—yet again
Waters Wrap: The CAT is up and running, but with a conservative SEC in place and renewed pressure from politicians and exchanges, Anthony says the controversial database faces a death by a thousand cuts.
Exchanges plead with SEC to trim CAT reporting requirements
Letters from Cboe, Nasdaq and NYSE ask that the new Atkins administration reduce the amount of data required for the Consolidated Audit Trail, and scrap options data collection entirely.
EU banks want the cloud closer to home amid tariff wars
Fears over US executive orders have prompted new approaches to critical third-party risk management.
Friendly fire? Nasdaq squeezes MTF competitors with steep fee increase
The stock exchange almost tripled the prices of some datasets for multilateral trading facilities, with sources saying the move is the latest effort by exchanges to offset declining trading revenues.
Europe is counting its vendors—and souring on US tech
Under DORA, every financial company with business in the EU must report use of their critical vendors. Deadlines vary, but the message doesn’t: The EU is taking stock of technology dependencies, especially upon US providers.