Michael Shashoua: Before and After NAFIS

Before the North American Financial Information Summit (NAFIS) last month, blockchain had already been on the minds of data management professionals. They look at the fragmented nature of its distributed-ledger technology, knowing that there are already plenty of reconciliation issues in reference data, and wonder how to contend with new hurdles to standardization and consistency.
NAFIS sessions explored data governance, regulatory compliance, managed services and the adoption of the legal entity identifier. Data science was addressed as an area that may not be correctly understood and should be more closely examined.
Yet it may be blockchain that is on the top of data managers’ minds. An informal survey of NAFIS attendees in the reference data stream sessions found that they see blockchain as the most likely disruptor for their operations in the next 10 years. Still, any application of blockchain’s distributed-ledger technology—corporate actions processing is already seeing this—will by its nature decentralize information.
Chris Vickery, managing director and chief operations officer at Nomura, argues that blockchain makes it possible to get a “single version of the truth,” and that the decentralization aspect is merely allowing “multiple editing points and multiple owners of the figures.”
Properly Appreciating Science
NAFIS attendees in the reference data stream see blockchain as the most likely disruptor for their operations in the next 10 years.
Another buzzword that parallels blockchain is “data science.” Afsheen Afshar, chief data science officer at JP Morgan Chase, sought to dispel some myths about data science in his remarks to NAFIS attendees. “The elephant in the room about data science is that it’s 90 percent data and 10 percent science, especially in financial services,” he said. To carry out typical data science goals such as increasing revenue, decreasing costs, minimizing risk, and improving management of human capital, firms should map data in service of an actionable insight derived from data science, according to Afshar.
He says “data-as-a-service” (DaaS) is the answer, which means harnessing and leveraging the “data estate”—information about where data is, what it means, and who owns it. Perhaps this approach should be applied to distributed-ledger technology if it catches on for reference data applications.
DaaS is geared toward answering human questions about a business issue. The question being asked has to be targeted, make sense, and be leading toward a purpose. As Afshar put it, “at least 10 times in my career, someone senior has asked me, ‘Can’t we mine LinkedIn data?’ What you should say to that is: To do what? Why? What business problem are we trying to solve?”
If data science is pursued correctly, and the industry doesn’t revert to managing data the way it always has, then the sought-after goals Afshar identified can be achieved.
Trying to Boost the LEI
Speaking of buzzwords, supporters of the legal entity identifier (LEI) are looking to give the LEI broader reach and significance than it currently has, through increased adoption. The LEI has been solidly implemented, as JP Morgan Chase’s Robin Doyle emphasized during a panel at NAFIS.
Still, it appears that the obligation to report LEIs is not as strong as it needs to be. According to the Regulatory Oversight Committee that endorses LEI issuers, over 415,000 entities were registered as of the end of January. Last year, Francis Gross of the European Central Bank called the number of LEIs registered (about 338,000 at the time) a “tiny fraction” of what the eventual total should be—and many sources have put the potential figure, or eventual necessary number of registrations, in the millions or multiple millions.
It’s apparent now that what the campaign by LEI adoption supporters needs is to push for a tipping point that creates an exponential jump in the number of registrations (or level of involvement)—just like blockchain and data science have gotten. That will require both strong leadership and greater understanding in the industry as a whole.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Emerging Technologies
BlueMatrix acquires FactSet’s RMS Partners platform
This is the third acquisition BlueMatrix has made this year.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 331: Cresting Wave’s Bill Murphy
Bill Murphy, Blackstone’s former CTO, joins to discuss that much-discussed MIT study on AI projects failing and factors executives should consider as the technology continues to evolves.
FactSet adds MarketAxess CP+ data, LSEG files dismissal, BNY’s new AI lab, and more
The Waters Cooler: Synthetic data for LLM training, Dora confusion, GenAI’s ‘blind spots,’ and our 9/11 remembrance in this week’s news roundup.
Chief investment officers persist with GenAI tools despite ‘blind spots’
Trading heads from JP Morgan, UBS, and M&G Investments explained why their firms were bullish on GenAI, even as “replicability and reproducibility” challenges persist.
Wall Street hesitates on synthetic data as AI push gathers steam
Deutsche Bank and JP Morgan have differing opinions on the use of synthetic data to train LLMs.
A Q&A with H2O’s tech chief on reducing GenAI noise
Timothée Consigny says the key to GenAI experimentation rests in leveraging the expertise of portfolio managers “to curate smaller and more relevant datasets.”
Etrading wins UK bond tape, R3 debuts new lab, TNS buys Radianz, and more
The Waters Cooler: The Swiss release an LLM, overnight trading strays further from reach, and the private markets frenzy continues in this week’s news roundup.
AI fails for many reasons but succeeds for few
Firms hoping to achieve ROI on their AI efforts must focus on data, partnerships, and scale—but a fundamental roadblock remains.