Opening Cross: Buy, Build or Bust?
In light of two recent developments in the market data world, Max looks at the pros and cons of each side of the buy versus build debate.
If you choose to buy technology rather than build it in-house, the good news is that your project will generally come in cheaper than building it from scratch yourself, because you can leverage vendors’ “build-once-sell-many-times” economies of scale—and that includes not only the “raw materials” cost of hardware and software licenses, but also the cost of hiring staff—or the opportunity cost of taking them away from other projects—with the requisite skills. There’s also the fact that—especially in today’s fast-moving markets, where being first to market can deliver a fleeting yet worthwhile advantage—it’s quicker to deploy an off-the-shelf solution than building one yourself.
For example, if I need a new kettle, I’m going to walk the store and buy one. Even if I were an electrical engineer, I doubt I’d (a) be able to do that on the fly; (b) be able to buy the components cheaper than the cost of a new kettle; and (c) get it done in time to fulfill the client requirement—i.e., make myself a cup of coffee.
But on the other hand, if you buy the same tools as everyone else, you should expect to perform only as well—or as badly—as everyone else. And one of the reasons that firms pursue in-house builds is because they think they can deliver an advantage over the commodity tools available on the market. Indeed, that’s how a lot of low-latency developments eventually became mainstream—because initially firms built their own feed handlers or microwave networks. Once everyone else has caught up, they can buy off-the-shelf again, but in the meantime, they’ve had an advantage, and an opportunity to make more money.
Another reason firms are willing to build in-house—even when it might be clearly more expensive to do so—is to avoid vendor lock-in that could prove much more expensive in the long term. A kettle might be cheap, but when I also have to buy that manufacturer’s proprietary power adapter plus a special water filter to prevent limescale buildup, and an extension cord because this wonderful new kettle won’t fit where my old one did, the incremental costs add up—and that sunk investment makes me more likely to buy the same kettle again, rather than switching brands if I know I’m going to have to replace all those incidentals.
For example, low-cost data terminal provider Money.Net has begun building its own “next-generation” news service, leveraging a combination of traditional journalism and artificial intelligence to identify and break market-moving corporate news faster than traditional wires. The vendor chose to build the service itself—as it does with other aspects of its platform—because it feels this gives it more control over creativity, quality, build speed and costs, says chief executive Morgan Downey.
On the other hand, data inventory monitoring and cost control software vendor The Roberts Group has acquired Priory Solutions, a provider of similar services for the legal industry, in no small part because of Priory’s ability to provide detailed usage tracking around content delivered over the internet. This isn’t to say that TRG couldn’t build that functionality itself, given time, but the acquisition allows the vendor to start using it right away, and benefitting from an advantage that its competitors may not have.
Is there a third way that can not only make finding the right tools less of a stark choice, and gives you an element of both buy and build while mitigating the risks of each? Well, yes—at least, sort of—but I’ll save that discussion for another time.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Emerging Technologies
Waters Wavelength Podcast: Broadridge’s Joseph Lo on GPTs
Joseph Lo, head of enterprise platforms at Broadridge, joins the podcast to discuss AI tools.
Man Group CTO eyes ‘significant impact’ for genAI across the fund
Man Group’s Gary Collier discussed the potential merits of and use cases for generative AI across the business at an event in London hosted by Bloomberg.
BNY Mellon deploys Nvidia DGX SuperPOD, identifies hundreds of AI use cases
BNY Mellon says it is the first bank to deploy Nvidia’s AI datacenter infrastructure, as it joins an increasing number of Wall Street firms that are embracing AI technologies.
This Week: Linedata acquires DreamQuark, Tradeweb, Rimes, Genesis, and more
A summary of some of the latest financial technology news.
Systematic tools gain favor in fixed income
Automation is enabling systematic strategies in fixed income that were previously reserved for equities trading. The tech gap between the two may be closing, but differences remain.
Euronext microwave link aims to cut HFT advantage in Europe
Exchange plans to level playing field between prop firms and banks in cash equities with cutting edge tech.
Why recent failures are a catalyst for DLT’s success
Deutsche Bank’s Mathew Kathayanat and Jie Yi Lee argue that DLT's high-profile failures don't mean the technology is dead. Now that the hype has died down, the path is cleared for more measured decisions about DLT’s applications.
‘Very careful thought’: T+1 will introduce costs, complexities for ETF traders
When the US moves to T+1 at the end of May 2024, firms trading ETFs will need to automate their workflows as much as possible to avoid "settlement misalignment" and additional costs.
Most read
- Chris Edmonds takes the reins at ICE Fixed Income and Data Services
- Deutsche Börse democratizes data with Marketplace offering
- Sell-Side Technology Awards 2024: All the winners