A Long Way to Go

Despite the progress made, however, reforms are long past the 2012 deadline for implementation, with the only real high point so far being the CFTC's finalization of swap execution facility (SEF) rules earlier this year. The G20's goal may have been unrealistic to start with, given the myriad concerns and tangential problems that have been presented with transitioning the OTC market from a bilateral, voice-based trading model to one that incorporates electronic trading, central clearing and reporting.
One of the key areas of contention has been around the applicability of foreign rules when it comes to non-nation firms, with the most extraordinary example being the extraterritoriality of the Dodd-Frank Act, and its Title VII provisions that govern OTC trading. While the FSB is right to point out the steps forward made with regards the cross-border substituted compliance work undertaken by the CFTC, these are individual agreements made between regulators, and do not encompass some important financial centers.
US Advantages
Europe must take a weighty portion of the blame by continually dithering over the implementation of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive review (Mifid II) and the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR), both of which have provisions designed to implement G20 mandates. It is somewhat alarming that, five years after the financial crisis truly began and four years after the G20 decrees, there is only minimal practical implementation, the rest being theory and debate.
The technology is there to put these things in place, if the many, many conversations I had with vendors and platforms around the time the SEF rules came out are anything to go by. Most of them are eyeing Europe and its organized trading facility (OTF) regime as a money spinner, given their experience with SEFs and operating trading platforms long before they were called that.
Organized Chaos
What the entire process of OTC reform has done, however, is highlight the difficulties in achieving harmonization across different jurisdictions. This isn't just in Asia-Pacific, which is well known for its fragmented structure, but also across the US, the EU, Latin America and other markets. The US has the ball rolling, and it will be coming to other areas, but questions remain over how much disruption it will cause when it does become widespread. The central clearing deadlines for large institutions, for example, passed uneventfully for some, but for others caused chaos, and volumes were lower.
Europe must take a weighty portion of the blame by continually dithering over the implementation of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive review (Mifid II) and the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR), both of which have provisions designed to implement G20 mandates.
Of more concern are the holes in the system, the potential weak points consistently identified by nearly every trader I speak to, such as the CCPs. What happens if they fail? People don't seem to be concerned about another Lehman, so much, as they do a clearing house failing, and the standards must be in place before they're implemented fully.
Essentially, there may be steps forward, but the industry as a whole still has a long way to go.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Doing a deal? Prioritize info security early
Engaging information security teams early in licensing deals can deliver better results and catch potential issues. Neglecting them can cause delays and disruption, writes Devexperts’ Heetesh Rawal in this op-ed.
SEC pulls rulemaking proposals in bid for course correction
The regulator withdrew 14 Gensler-era proposals, including the controversial predictive data analytics proposal.
Trading venues seen as easiest targets for Esma supervision
Platforms do not pose systemic risks for member states and are already subject to consistent rules.
The Consolidated Audit Trail faces an uncertain fate—yet again
Waters Wrap: The CAT is up and running, but with a conservative SEC in place and renewed pressure from politicians and exchanges, Anthony says the controversial database faces a death by a thousand cuts.
Exchanges plead with SEC to trim CAT reporting requirements
Letters from Cboe, Nasdaq and NYSE ask that the new Atkins administration reduce the amount of data required for the Consolidated Audit Trail, and scrap options data collection entirely.
EU banks want the cloud closer to home amid tariff wars
Fears over US executive orders have prompted new approaches to critical third-party risk management.
Friendly fire? Nasdaq squeezes MTF competitors with steep fee increase
The stock exchange almost tripled the prices of some datasets for multilateral trading facilities, with sources saying the move is the latest effort by exchanges to offset declining trading revenues.
Europe is counting its vendors—and souring on US tech
Under DORA, every financial company with business in the EU must report use of their critical vendors. Deadlines vary, but the message doesn’t: The EU is taking stock of technology dependencies, especially upon US providers.