Moving Mission-Critical Functions to the Cloud
At this year's North American Trading Architecture Summit (NATAS), panelists from the sell side ─ Citi, UBS, Deutsche Bank and State Street, to be specific ─ said that they would not be willing to move mission-critical functions to the cloud.
Now maybe I don't fully understand what exactly a "mission-critical" function is, but I am constantly writing about firms sending their email to the cloud; risk management systems, portfolio management systems, and even order management systems and execution management systems that are being run through the cloud too; and any number of data management capabilities that are being sent to the cloud. To that last point, fair enough, you will never see client information run through a public cloud. But internal, private clouds are clouds, nonetheless.
When the audience in attendance was asked to raise their hands if they have moved any of their business critical functions to the cloud, no one moved. Were they afraid to say? Did they not know? Was there really not a single company in the room that had moved mission critical platforms and services into the cloud? Was everyone simply in the room waiting for lunch to be served?
Then a CIO from a mid-sized asset manager came forward and made the case for mission critical functions to run through a non-public cloud that has a dedicated network to back up the system.
"We have moved some very important functions out [to the cloud] through a SaaS model," the CIO said. "With a dedicated network to those functions, I don't see why we can't move mission critical functions out there. For us we say cloud implies access over the Internet; I would not put mission critical functions with reliance on access to the Internet. But with the traditional network going out of two sides of your building, I think we would consider mission critical functions in the cloud."
I think that if we're going to have an honest discussion about cloud, then we need to first define what we're talking about when we say cloud (and most importantly, private versus public, as the latter is not viable for mission-critical) and then we need to define what exact systems and platforms are mission-critical, and which systems can handle an outage without wreaking havoc on the institution, making them better targets for a public cloud).
The best people to lead these conversations are the technologists. Business leaders and traders aren't going to have the understanding as to the differences of a private cloud versus Amazon Web Services (AWS) or Google's cloud. They don't know how an outage occurs and what it means to their trading systems.
This isn't just a conversation about a data breach that leaks client information ─ that's the "worst nightmare scenario". I do believe that mission-critical functions are moving to the cloud in ever-increasing droves; I just think that semantics are getting in the way of this conversation.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Emerging Technologies
API security flaw highlights AI model vulnerabilities
Researchers uncover a way to make weaker AI models reveal the hidden reasoning of more powerful systems.
On vibe coding, no/low-code dev, and some potential misconceptions
The Waters Wrap: Is no-code/low-code even a thing anymore? Not really. But the companies that championed those terms just a few years ago tell Anthony they aren’t going anywhere.
Repo tokens won’t be cleared. Or will they?
Uncertainty lingers over clearing status of tokenized Treasuries, with decision likely devolved to DTCC.
AI startups get big-name investors, SEC denies 24X’s exemption request, and more
The Waters Cooler: A recap of the major tech and data news from the past week in the capital markets.
Rapid-fire repo raises hopes of cheaper, faster trading
Tokenized Treasuries piloted by DTCC could squash settlement cycles and enable 24/7 repo.
Stopgaps and fail-safes: How trading vendors guard against rogue AI agents
TradeStation’s newest trading tool, Titan-X, uses agentic tools to help plan, execute, and collect data on trades.
A rookie’s guide to tokenized Treasuries
What are DTCC’s digital US government debt securities? How do tokenized repo and other transactions work? These questions, and others, answered.
The complexity of using AI to tackle compliance
The Waters Wrap: Law firms are introducing new tools to help with regulatory compliance, potentially encroaching on regtech vendors’ territory, Wei-Shen writes.