Opening Cross: When You Look East, Look Up and Look Out

“Remember: Stop and look up,” I tell visitors to New York—because while it’s easy to become swept up in the hustle and bustle at ground level, skyward is where you’ll spot some of the most interesting architectural and historical sights. Yet I still haven’t learned my own lesson when visiting parts of Asia, where the instruction to look up isn’t just for nostalgia, but because that’s where much of the action takes place—from the elevated walkways that lead pedestrians from building to building without having to cross traffic, to restaurants tucked away and all but invisible to those on the ground.
The lesson is the same in the industry: Look up, and you won’t be taken by surprise when seeking new ways to analyze data to identify alpha in highly competitive marketplaces, or just trying to avoid being blindsided by new regulations, which took up a significant proportion of discussions at the Asia-Pacific Financial Information Conference last week, making it no surprise that spend on risk-related data and tools is dominating market-wide data revenues, according to Douglas Taylor of Burton-Taylor International Consulting, who presented a keynote at the event.
But according to Taylor’s research, Asia is the one region where real-time equities data dominates spend, and where equities sales and trading business remains the main source of revenues (compared to investment management in the rest of the world). Given this dichotomy, it’s no surprise that firms in Asia seem particularly concerned with meeting deadlines for global initiatives such as the Legal Entity Identifier, FATCA and Solvency II, and regional laws such as Japan’s amended short-sale rules—which caught out a few firms last week—or new laws governing electronic trading in Hong Kong described at the event by Nick Ronalds of the Asia Securities and Financial Markets Association.
ASIFMA’s solution to managing the new requirements that might otherwise have overwhelmed the association and its members was to force all participants to collaborate on a definitive guideline document (at least, as definitive as possible, given that the regulator won’t endorse it, Rolands said)—soon to become an online, auditable declaration and certification system for demonstrating compliance—that would avoid the potential confusion of each firm creating and acting on their own interpretation of the rules.
ASIFMA’s approach isn’t unique, with others extolling the benefits of collaboration: “When we collaborate, we can do something once and everyone benefits from shared knowledge… to deal with the regulations being forced on us,” said Nick Taplin, senior pre-sales executive for data management services at SmartStream.
Why is this the job of market and reference data professionals? Because ultimately, many of these challenges are data problems at their core: Counterparty issues are about how much data you have about who you do business with, while solvency and capital adequacy issues trace back to how well you manage your holdings and liquidity data. And even firms with well-organized data management processes find this to be akin to a journey of self-discovery as they learn what data they have, and where it is kept.
These measures will stand the industry in good stead in the event of more regional regulation. But with some Asian economies no longer growing as fast as they did during the global economic crisis, “some Asian countries have to make a choice—there is a large tradeoff between regulation and economic growth,” said David Lecompte, senior strategic business development manager at SIX Financial Information.
Of course, market participants don’t have the luxury of picking and choosing the regulations they comply with. But they do get to choose how they achieve compliance—they can do it alone and look out just for themselves, or as part of a movement that looks up to a loftier ambition: to get it right for everyone, with collaborative models and even shared utilities to ensure that regulation governs—but doesn’t disrupt—the markets.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Doing a deal? Prioritize info security early
Engaging information security teams early in licensing deals can deliver better results and catch potential issues. Neglecting them can cause delays and disruption, writes Devexperts’ Heetesh Rawal in this op-ed.
SEC pulls rulemaking proposals in bid for course correction
The regulator withdrew 14 Gensler-era proposals, including the controversial predictive data analytics proposal.
Trading venues seen as easiest targets for Esma supervision
Platforms do not pose systemic risks for member states and are already subject to consistent rules.
The Consolidated Audit Trail faces an uncertain fate—yet again
Waters Wrap: The CAT is up and running, but with a conservative SEC in place and renewed pressure from politicians and exchanges, Anthony says the controversial database faces a death by a thousand cuts.
Exchanges plead with SEC to trim CAT reporting requirements
Letters from Cboe, Nasdaq and NYSE ask that the new Atkins administration reduce the amount of data required for the Consolidated Audit Trail, and scrap options data collection entirely.
EU banks want the cloud closer to home amid tariff wars
Fears over US executive orders have prompted new approaches to critical third-party risk management.
Friendly fire? Nasdaq squeezes MTF competitors with steep fee increase
The stock exchange almost tripled the prices of some datasets for multilateral trading facilities, with sources saying the move is the latest effort by exchanges to offset declining trading revenues.
Europe is counting its vendors—and souring on US tech
Under DORA, every financial company with business in the EU must report use of their critical vendors. Deadlines vary, but the message doesn’t: The EU is taking stock of technology dependencies, especially upon US providers.