Regulation special report

Click here to download the PDF
A Never-Ending Story
Complying with new regulations governing how the financial services industry works tends to be pretty costly. I remember moderating the CIOs' panel discussion at our Waters USA event in New York back in December 2010, where I asked the panel members-Peter Kelso, CIO, Deutsche Asset Management; Michael Radziemski, CIO, Lord Abbett and Co.; Scott Marcar, global head of risk and finance technology, RBS; Peter Richards, CTO, JPMorgan; and Drew Vaden, CIO, Nomura Holdings-to estimate how much of the following year's IT budget would be swallowed up by compliance and regulatory spending. The consensus was startling: All the panelists estimated that spending in this area would account for between 30 and 40 percent of their overall 2011 budgets, although they weren't prepared to drill down into the figures to provide a more transparent breakdown of exactly what was being allocated to which area of compliance and regulatory spending.
At the CIOs' panel discussion at the recently held Buy-Side Technology European summit in London, I posed that same question to the four panelists-Chris Sims, CTO, Ignis Asset Management; Simon Lumsdon, CTO, Bluebay Asset Management; Julian Hingorani, CTO, UBS Global Asset Management; and Neil Panchen, CTO, Altana Wealth. I was surprised to hear that their spending forecastswere far more modest-in the region of 10 percent of their total IT budgets. These two examples illustrate the extent to which regulatory and compliance spending differ from firm to firm, even though their regulatory requirements are broadly similar.
Much has been made of the role played by data-the stuff that makes the capital markets world go round-when it comes to regulation and compliance, a phenomenon covered in detail by the Q&A section of this special report that starts on page four. In many respects, a firm's ability to provide evidence of its compliance to regulatory bodies across a range of business activities is largely contingent on the efficacy of its data management processes and governance. In this respect, the greatest challenge facing both buy-side and sell-side firms is not so much generating and storing the requisite data, but rather producing it on demand, in the right format, in a reasonable time period. And that boils down to sound data management, a never-ending story across the capital markets, if ever there was one.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Europe is counting its vendors—and souring on US tech
Under DORA, every financial company with business in the EU must report use of their critical vendors. Deadlines vary, but the message doesn’t: The EU is taking stock of technology dependencies, especially upon US providers.
Regulators can’t dodge DOGE, but can they still get by?
The Waters Wrap: With Trump and DOGE nipping at regulators’ heels, what might become of the CAT, the FDTA, or vendor-operated SEFs?
CFTC takes red pen to swaps rules, but don’t call it a rollback
Lawyers and ex-regs say agency is fine-tuning and clarifying regulations, not eliminating them.
The European T+1 effect on Asia
T+1 is coming in Europe, and Asian firms should assess impacts and begin preparations now, says the DTCC’s Val Wotton.
FCA sets up shop in US, asset managers collab, M&A heats up, and more
The Waters Cooler: Nasdaq and Bruce ATS partner for overnight market data, Osttra gets sold to KKR, and the SEC takes on DOGE in this week’s news roundup.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 312: Jibber-jabber
Tony, Reb, and Nyela talk about tariffs (not really), journalism (sorta), and pop culture (mostly).
Experts say HKEX’s plan for T+1 in 2025 is ‘sensible’
The exchange will continue providing core post-trade processing through CCASS but will engage with market participants on the service’s future as HKEX rolls out new OCP features.
No, no, no, and no: Overnight trading fails in SIP votes
The CTA and UTP operating committees voted yesterday on proposals from US exchanges to expand their trading hours and could not reach unanimous consensus.