Evaluated Pricing Poised For Breakout
User demands, rather than regulatory spurs, fueling improvements in evaluation offering

Looking at the broad sweep of what Inside Reference Data has followed in the development of evaluated pricing over the past couple years, what had been embryonic about these offerings appears ready to start developing.
The foundations of concern about the value of evaluated prices, namely getting views into how they are sourced and making the process of evaluation transparent, appear to have solidified, according to professionals in the field who spoke on our July 14 webcast.
Daniel Johnson, head of valuation at Wells Fargo Global Fund Services in London, said that for 98% of the evaluated pricing data coming from providers, transparency is sufficient. The demand for greater transparency only happens when the data users are looking for requires a deeper dive into pricing numbers.
Firms' ability to assess how many sources they need on evaluated prices, and how sources compare, appears to have matured. Johnson observed that for securities with thin markets, some prices may be picked up by one provider but not another, depending on methodologies, and providers' strengths can vary by asset class, country or region.
Providers, for their part, are aware of these demands, as Thomson Reuters' Jayme Fagas said—users seek a "consolidated way to compare and contrast different data sources and sets," which is something her company is trying to address. S&P's Greg Carlin expects firms to use at least two providers, measuring them against each other.
On this basis, it's easier to understand why these professionals don't give all the credit for the progress of evaluated pricing to regulators' efforts to set standards for sourcing, whether through the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD) in Europe or the international IFRS 13 standard.
"We certainly have seen more firms interested in valuations pre- and post-trade—all the way from the trading desk back to portfolio pricing," said Carlin.
Johnson emphasized that professionals should remember that it's the service providers who supply evaluated pricing data, not regulators. Providers have been driven to offer data that covers more asset classes, and prices derived from comparison of multiple suppliers' information—all due to user demand.
Since firms have a better sense of what they want, and are communicating that more directly, the transparency and sourcing, and more importantly, the accuracy and quality of evaluated pricing data, is going to see an exponential increase.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
Growing pains: Why good data and fortitude are crucial for banks’ tech projects
The IMD Wrap: Max examines recent WatersTechnology deep dives into long-term technology projects at several firms and the role data plays in those efforts.
Investing in the invisible, ING plots a tech renaissance
Voice of the CTO: Less than a year in the job, Daniele Tonella delves into ING’s global data platform, gives his thoughts on the future of Agile development, and talks about the importance of “invisible controls” for tech development.
Optiver relies on BMLL market data for quant strategy
The market-maker has built its trading business on top of BMLL’s Level 3 data. But the collaboration is young, and the pair have grand plans to make options the next quant frontier.
Bloomberg expands IBVAL; the SIPs and 24/5 trading; Broadridge’s agentic play, and more
The Waters Cooler: State Street embraces interop, Citi’s CIO outlines the XiNG risk platform, power companies explore alternative nuclear supply options to datacenters, and more.
As costs rise, buy-side CIOs urge caution on AI
Conference attendees encouraged asset managers to tread carefully when looking to deploy AI-driven solutions, citing high cost pressures.
XiNG: Inside Citi’s all-encompassing risk platform
Voice of the CTO: Citi’s chief information officer, Jon Lofthouse, explains how and why the bank has extended its enterprise-wide risk platform so that every trade in any asset class goes through it.
Demand for private markets data turns users into providers
Buy-side firms seeking standardized, user-friendly datasets are turning toward a new section of the alternatives market to get their fix—each other.
LSEG-AWS extend partnership, Deutsche Bank’s AI plans, GenAI (and regular AI) concerns, and more
The Waters Cooler: Nasdaq and MTFs bicker about data fees, Craig Donohue to take the reins at Cboe, and Clearwater closes its Beacon deal, in this week’s news roundup.