Risk Data Preparedness Low, But Rising, Survey Finds
Deloitte Global research sees increasing challenges, but more effectiveness on risk infrastructure

Compliance with regulatory demands concerning risk data, such as data quality and aggregation, Solvency II, Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR), Options Clearing Corporation standards and others, is proving difficult for some firms, according to a survey of chief risk officers from 71 firms with aggregate assets of $18 trillion, conducted by Deloitte Global from August to November last year.
When naming compliance challenges, 62 percent of respondents said risk information systems and technology infrastructure is extremely or very challenging, and 46 percent said risk data itself is extremely or very challenging.
Although when asked in which areas of risk data and infrastructure their firms are effective, less than half of survey respondents could cite any single category. However, responses to some areas have risen since 2012, in the survey, which has been conducted annually for nine years. Data management and maintenance rose from 20 percent in 2012 to 39 percent last year; data process architecture and workflow logic rose from 23 to 35 percent over the same time, and data controls and checks stayed roughly level, dropping slightly from 33 percent to 31 percent.
Asked about overall concerns with risk technology systems, adaptability to changing regulatory requirements rose from 40 percent in 2012 to 48 percent last year, and lack of integration of systems rose from 31 percent to 46 percent over the same time.
More on Regulation
Doing a deal? Prioritize info security early
Engaging information security teams early in licensing deals can deliver better results and catch potential issues. Neglecting them can cause delays and disruption, writes Devexperts’ Heetesh Rawal in this op-ed.
SEC pulls rulemaking proposals in bid for course correction
The regulator withdrew 14 Gensler-era proposals, including the controversial predictive data analytics proposal.
Trading venues seen as easiest targets for Esma supervision
Platforms do not pose systemic risks for member states and are already subject to consistent rules.
The Consolidated Audit Trail faces an uncertain fate—yet again
Waters Wrap: The CAT is up and running, but with a conservative SEC in place and renewed pressure from politicians and exchanges, Anthony says the controversial database faces a death by a thousand cuts.
Exchanges plead with SEC to trim CAT reporting requirements
Letters from Cboe, Nasdaq and NYSE ask that the new Atkins administration reduce the amount of data required for the Consolidated Audit Trail, and scrap options data collection entirely.
EU banks want the cloud closer to home amid tariff wars
Fears over US executive orders have prompted new approaches to critical third-party risk management.
Friendly fire? Nasdaq squeezes MTF competitors with steep fee increase
The stock exchange almost tripled the prices of some datasets for multilateral trading facilities, with sources saying the move is the latest effort by exchanges to offset declining trading revenues.
Europe is counting its vendors—and souring on US tech
Under DORA, every financial company with business in the EU must report use of their critical vendors. Deadlines vary, but the message doesn’t: The EU is taking stock of technology dependencies, especially upon US providers.