Risk Data Preparedness Low, But Rising, Survey Finds
Deloitte Global research sees increasing challenges, but more effectiveness on risk infrastructure
Compliance with regulatory demands concerning risk data, such as data quality and aggregation, Solvency II, Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR), Options Clearing Corporation standards and others, is proving difficult for some firms, according to a survey of chief risk officers from 71 firms with aggregate assets of $18 trillion, conducted by Deloitte Global from August to November last year.
When naming compliance challenges, 62 percent of respondents said risk information systems and technology infrastructure is extremely or very challenging, and 46 percent said risk data itself is extremely or very challenging.
Although when asked in which areas of risk data and infrastructure their firms are effective, less than half of survey respondents could cite any single category. However, responses to some areas have risen since 2012, in the survey, which has been conducted annually for nine years. Data management and maintenance rose from 20 percent in 2012 to 39 percent last year; data process architecture and workflow logic rose from 23 to 35 percent over the same time, and data controls and checks stayed roughly level, dropping slightly from 33 percent to 31 percent.
Asked about overall concerns with risk technology systems, adaptability to changing regulatory requirements rose from 40 percent in 2012 to 48 percent last year, and lack of integration of systems rose from 31 percent to 46 percent over the same time.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Brokers must shift HFT servers after China colocation ban
New exchange guidance drives rush for “proximity colo” in nearby datacenters.
Banks split over AI risk management
Model teams hold the reins, but some argue AI is an enterprise risk.
New EBA taxonomy could help banks track AI risk
Extra loss flags will allow banks to track transversal risks like geopolitics and AI, say experts.
Risk managers question US reach of Dora third-party list
Some EU subsidiaries included, but regulator control over cloud providers could still be limited.
Where have four years of Cusip legal drama gone?
The IMD Wrap: The antitrust case against Cusip Global Services has been a long, winding road. Reb recaps what you might have missed.
2026 will be the year agent armies awaken
Waters Wrap: Several AI experts have recently said that the next 12 months will see significant progress for agentic AI. Are capital markets firms ready for this shift from generative AI to agents?
Despite regulatory thaw in US, major questions remain globally for 2026
From crypto and tokenization to the CAT to consolidated tapes to T+1’s advancement, the regulatory space will be front and center in the New Year.
Will overnight trading in equity markets expand next year? It’s complicated.
The potential for expanded overnight trading in US equity markets sparked debate this year, whether people liked it or not.