October 2011: UBS, How Could You Not Know?
I remember a feeling bordering on indifference when I first learned of the most recent example of corporate malfeasance involving an investment bank. In this case it was UBS, although I remember thinking at the time that it might just have easily have been any of the other Wall Street and City high fliers announcing “rogue trader” losses in the region of $2 billion.
Kweku Adoboli, head of the Swiss bank’s global synthetic equities team, somehow managed to hide the extent of the hole he had dug himself into, until his September 15 arrest on suspicion of fraud relating to those losses. The UK’s Financial Services Authority (FSA) was informed, as were the police, and Adoboli was duly charged the following day.
I guess it’s a sign of the times in which we live, but the details surrounding the Adoboli incident are mostly inconsequential. The one thing that isn’t—and this is what everybody wants to know—is how it was possible that no one else knew of Adoboli’s shenanigans? Perhaps I have an overly prosaic understanding of how banks work, but I find it inconceivable that he was the only person aware of what was going on.
Granted, it’s unlikely that a trader would send a group email to the Exco and risk management department detailing the carnage resulting from a particularly bad day at the office, but in the same vein, I simply cannot reconcile the notion that for an organization like UBS, loose cannons like Adoboli can remain undetected for so long. And it’s not like Adoboli was a revered staff member with years of outstanding performance and experience behind him—he was, in banking terms, still wet behind the ears.
Hopefully, all will be revealed in the “official” investigation, although the cynic in me expects not much more than a few rolling heads—the first being that of Oswald Gruebel, the bank’s CEO who resigned on September 24—a sanitized version of the events loosely resembling the truth, and the usual hollow promises from the bank, the regulators and the industry in general that it’ll never happen again. And they’re right … until the next time, that is.
And for those of you who enjoy a bit of irony with your morning coffee, here’s a real gem: Adoboli, who now occupies third place on the all time biggest “losers” list behind Jérôme Kerviel and Yasuo Hamanaka, has allegedly retained the UK law firm of Kingsley Napley to represent him during the forthcoming legal proceedings, the same law firm that represented Nick Leeson after he singlehandedly brought Barings to its knees back in February 1995. It wouldn’t surprise me if Leeson has already been in touch with Adoboli extolling the virtues of the after-dinner-speech-making circuit, which, if urban legend is to be believed, has allowed Leeson to feather his nest very nicely, thank you.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Emerging Technologies
Waters Wavelength Ep. 357: Off topic, on record
This week, Tony, Reb, and Shen talk about non-tech things.
Citi reveals Custody+, AI API security scare, 23/5 trading in Canada, and more
The Waters Cooler: A recap of the major tech and data news from the past week in the capital markets.
API security flaw highlights AI model vulnerabilities
Researchers uncover a way to make weaker AI models reveal the hidden reasoning of more powerful systems.
On vibe coding, no/low-code dev, and some potential misconceptions
The Waters Wrap: Is no-code/low-code even a thing anymore? Not really. But the companies that championed those terms just a few years ago tell Anthony they aren’t going anywhere.
Repo tokens won’t be cleared. Or will they?
Uncertainty lingers over clearing status of tokenized Treasuries, with decision likely devolved to DTCC.
AI startups get big-name investors, SEC denies 24X’s exemption request, and more
The Waters Cooler: A recap of the major tech and data news from the past week in the capital markets.
Rapid-fire repo raises hopes of cheaper, faster trading
Tokenized Treasuries piloted by DTCC could squash settlement cycles and enable 24/7 repo.
Stopgaps and fail-safes: How trading vendors guard against rogue AI agents
TradeStation’s newest trading tool, Titan-X, uses agentic tools to help plan, execute, and collect data on trades.