Tim Bourgaize Murray: Fifty Percent, Give or Take
Tim Murray picks apart the recent SS&C-Advent tie-up and speculates that SS&C might have paid way over the odds.

It's no understatement to say that the jolt on February 2 was one of the biggest pieces of news I've seen in three years with Waters. While financial technology ingests and analyzes massive amounts of money and risk every millisecond, it's quite unusual to find a deal in the industry itself that requires debt issuance of $2.63 billion in loans and up to an additional $500 million in unsecured notes.
As evidenced by Waters' feature on SS&C's Advent acquisition this month, inquiring minds often jump to several considerations: whether and how the firms will integrate their technologies; potential clashes of operating culture; and in this case, what certain Advent Geneva users think of a direct competitor in the fund administration space owning the technology they run on. All interesting questions.
The one thing we don't ask much about is the money, itself. It's essentially assumed that the two firms in question know what they're doing—that they've done their diligence, convinced shareholders, and spent a good deal of money engaging investment banks and consultancies about how to structure the transaction. That makes even more sense when SS&C is involved, which—to put it mildly—has a made a habit recently of snatching up companies, both big and small, usually profiting immensely along the way.
Not By a Little
And yet, that's obviously not how the acquisition business always works. Just take, for an example, Comcast's still-pending acquisition of Time Warner Cable announced last year, another blockbuster deal that would give Philadelphia-based Comcast unrivaled—some say monopolistic—market share across a number of media distribution and communications channels.
When the $45.2 billion buy was publicized, it was thought that Comcast's venerable lobbying strength would take care of the regulatory approval process in Washington, so much so that the two companies began investing heavily in rationalization and efficiencies right away. More than 12 months later, though, it still hasn't crossed the finish line, and with time elapsing and a major FCC decision about net neutrality since then, it might never. Don't ever assume, in other words.
That brings me back to the Advent deal and one senior executive I spoke with at a rival technology giant, who told me he smiled just a little when he read our coverage.
Like Time Warner, it was an open secret in the industry that Advent was selling, he explained, and a number of major providers did some window-shopping before Advent finally wrangled a buyer. This background knowledge led him to conclude that SS&C overpaid ... and not by a little.
"By fifty percent," he said, quite plainly.
Of course, that number blew me away, and it bears repeating, particularly given that both companies in question are publicly traded: SS&C may have paid more than a billion dollars for Advent above what it needed to.
Not So Subtle
Now, even if you consider the source's bias and don't stick to that number exactly—valuation, you understand, is a fickle science—the order of magnitude involved is still astounding. He said it's quite possible SS&C will tackle the debt financing involved with the sizeable Ebitda generated by the combined firms, and then begin deciding what pieces it wants to keep and sell off from the Advent stable. "But at this point, we think they were stronger companies separately than they are together," he added, going back to the original point—cost.
We all wonder why there aren't more major acquisitions in our industry. Bringing two teams of rival developers together is tough, while product rebranding is annoying, and too much consolidation can create tricky conflicts of interest. The buy side especially values stability in its technology platforms' ownership, so that's yet another deterrent. But in the end, getting the dollars and cents wrong early on can be incredibly expensive, if not a death knell.
SS&C will surely know the stakes, and their actions moving forward will reflect those stakes. I, for one, don't expect them to be subtle.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Emerging Technologies
EU banks want the cloud closer to home amid tariff wars
Fears over US executive orders have prompted new approaches to critical third-party risk management.
Growing pains: Why good data and fortitude are crucial for banks’ tech projects
The IMD Wrap: Max examines recent WatersTechnology deep dives into long-term technology projects at several firms and the role data plays in those efforts.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 317: Bitdefender and Transilvania Quantum
This week, Bitdefender’s Adrian Coleșa and Transilvania Quantum’s Sorin Boloș join to discuss security vulnerabilities in quantum computing.
Investing in the invisible, ING plots a tech renaissance
Voice of the CTO: Less than a year in the job, Daniele Tonella delves into ING’s global data platform, gives his thoughts on the future of Agile development, and talks about the importance of “invisible controls” for tech development.
Evalueserve tames GenAI to boost client’s cyber underwriting
Firm’s insurance client adopts machine learning to interrogate risk posed by hackers
Waters Wavelength Ep. 316: Finbourne Technology’s Toby Glaysher
This week, Toby Glaysher, chairman at Finbourne Technology, joins the podcast to discuss the asset servicing industry.
State Street’s interop play for FX and easing technical debt
Waters Wrap: About six years ago, State Street partnered with Interop.io to tie together its GlobalLINK suite of platforms. Anthony explores how this plays into the “reuse” mantra.
As costs rise, buy-side CIOs urge caution on AI
Conference attendees encouraged asset managers to tread carefully when looking to deploy AI-driven solutions, citing high cost pressures.