Commodities special report
Click here to download the PDF
The Wind of Change... Is Also Data
The commodities markets are in a state of flux. But unlike the changes that have impacted many other asset classes over the past couple of years, commodities are booming, producing a surge in demand for market data on everything from oil and coal to base and precious metals, and crops and livestock, and attracting interest from not just the major commodities trading firms and brokerages, but other speculative traders, hedgers managing risk against related instruments, and even mainstream investors via commodity funds and exchange-traded funds.
But in addition to the usual types of market data required for trading other asset classes-quotes, trades, terms and conditions, maturities, historical information, research, fundamental data, and charting and analytics-commodities also have a range of additional information that must be collected, ranging from crop growth, Department of Agriculture reports, supply and demand data, metrics on the output of individual mines, and weather. And while price data is broadly available from vendors and brokers, more specialized data is frequently the preserve of niche suppliers.
Not only must this data be consolidated together to be useful; it must also be consolidated with other, related information to meet the demands of cross-asset trading strategies as firms arbitrage commodities against each other, or even against other asset classes-trading physical coal or oil against stock in mining or petrochemical companies, for example.
And as these data demands grow, firms will be forced to deal with the same issues that have already been addressed in other asset classes, such as the need for robust data infrastructures that consolidate fragmented sources of increasing volumes of data, and the efficiency arguments of utilizing real-time datafeeds in the back-office as well as on trading desks, to reduce the risk of error from manual processing.
Meanwhile, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission is deciding on setting limits around the level of positions traders can hold in energy and metals futures. Not only does this leave traders uncertain of whether their holdings are compliant or not with the upcoming rules, but also places a burden on the CFTC to collect its own data for the purposes of real-time monitoring of industry positions.
If commodities weren't complicated enough, they're about to reach the next level, and traders and data providers will all need to respond.
Click here to download the PDF
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
Editor’s Picks: Our best from 2025
Anthony Malakian picks out 10 stories from the past 12 months that set the stage for the new year.
Market data costs defy cyclicality
Trading firms continue to grapple with escalating market data costs. Can innovative solutions and strategic approaches bring relief?
LSEG partners with Citi, DTCC goes on-chain, AI on the brain, and more
The Waters Cooler: Trading Technologies buys OpenGamma, CT Plan updates, and the beginning of benchmarking in this week’s news roundup.
AI & data enablement: A looming reality or pipe dream?
Waters Wrap: The promise of AI and agents is massive, and real-world success stories are trickling out. But Anthony notes that firms still need to be hyper-focused on getting the data foundation correct before adding layers.
Data managers worry lack of funding, staffing will hinder AI ambitions
Nearly two-thirds of respondents to WatersTechnology’s data benchmark survey rated the pressure they’re receiving from senior executives and the board as very high. But is the money flowing for talent and data management?
Data standardization is the ‘trust accelerator’ for broader AI adoption
In this guest column, data product managers at Fitch Solutions explain AI’s impact on credit and investment risk management.
As AI pressures mount, banks split on how to handle staffing
Benchmarking: Over the next 12 months, almost a third of G-Sib respondents said they plan to decrease headcount in their data function.
Everyone wants to tokenize the assets. What about the data?
The IMD Wrap: With exchanges moving market data on-chain, Wei-Shen believes there’s a need to standardize licensing agreements.