Is Grease The Word for Identifiers?

Inevitably, every costume shop that pops up in advance of Halloween here in New York will have some variation on the characters from "Grease"—a ‘50s Travolta-like greaser or a "Pink Lady" gang outfit. So I was struck by a remark made in our LEI webcast (to be summarized in a feature in the November print edition of Inside Reference Data going to press this week) that the legal entity identifier should be viewed as "strategic grease" for "the wheels" of the industry's reference data management.
This inventive turn of phrase was coined to describe how the LEI can eliminate friction coming from miscommunicated or confused fund names, market events or entity identifiers. But to listen to the webcast as a whole, or read our upcoming report, it looks like "strategic grease" still needs to be applied to getting firms to register for an LEI and be prepared to comply with the LEI standard.
Last month, we also identified another issue that may need some grease—intellectual property claims on the LEI. But more striking, polls taken during the webcast found that just 24% of our listeners (about 600 people tuned in) had registered themselves for an LEI, but 59% see implementation of the LEI as a strategic investment, rather than just a regulatory compliance requirement. In addition, 46% said combining their LEI projects with other projects designed to meet their firms' business requirements was the biggest hurdle they saw for meeting the LEI standard.
Judging by these numbers, which aren't a scientifically rigorous assessment, but still a good representative snapshot of what's happening in the industry, it appears that there is at least some understanding of the value of implementing the LEI. Some spur is needed, though, to propel firms to make the leap from just having an LEI to seeing the LEI as a strategic investment and getting it combined with high-priority business operations projects—the equivalent of Sandy showing up in the black bodysuit and getting Danny back at the end of that movie.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Doing a deal? Prioritize info security early
Engaging information security teams early in licensing deals can deliver better results and catch potential issues. Neglecting them can cause delays and disruption, writes Devexperts’ Heetesh Rawal in this op-ed.
SEC pulls rulemaking proposals in bid for course correction
The regulator withdrew 14 Gensler-era proposals, including the controversial predictive data analytics proposal.
Trading venues seen as easiest targets for Esma supervision
Platforms do not pose systemic risks for member states and are already subject to consistent rules.
The Consolidated Audit Trail faces an uncertain fate—yet again
Waters Wrap: The CAT is up and running, but with a conservative SEC in place and renewed pressure from politicians and exchanges, Anthony says the controversial database faces a death by a thousand cuts.
Exchanges plead with SEC to trim CAT reporting requirements
Letters from Cboe, Nasdaq and NYSE ask that the new Atkins administration reduce the amount of data required for the Consolidated Audit Trail, and scrap options data collection entirely.
EU banks want the cloud closer to home amid tariff wars
Fears over US executive orders have prompted new approaches to critical third-party risk management.
Friendly fire? Nasdaq squeezes MTF competitors with steep fee increase
The stock exchange almost tripled the prices of some datasets for multilateral trading facilities, with sources saying the move is the latest effort by exchanges to offset declining trading revenues.
Europe is counting its vendors—and souring on US tech
Under DORA, every financial company with business in the EU must report use of their critical vendors. Deadlines vary, but the message doesn’t: The EU is taking stock of technology dependencies, especially upon US providers.