Barclays, Credit Suisse Acquiesce to SEC Dark Pool Settlements
Barclays and Credit Suisse agree to pay $70 million and $84.3 million, respectively, to settle cases of misrepresentation of dark pool operations.

Both Barclays and Credit Suisse were charged with misleading investors over how the banks' respective dark pool trading venues operated. Barclays has agreed to pay $35 million to both the SEC and the New York Attorney General (NYAG), while Credit Suisse will pay $30 million to the SEC, $30 million to the NYAG, and $24.3 million in disgorgement and prejudgment interest to the SEC for a total of $84.3 million.
The SEC's charge against Barclays was focused on the bank's failure to police its dark pool through a feature called "Liquidity Profiling", which was meant to police order flow in its LX dark pool, while the bank ran weekly surveillance for toxic order flow. The SEC found that Barclays neither ran surveillance or used the Liquidity Profiling tool, and also has over-ridden the feature by moving some subscribers from the most aggressive categories to the least aggressive, without informing investors.
"Barclays misrepresented its efforts to police its dark pool, overrode its surveillance tool, and misled its subscribers about data feeds at the very time that data feeds were an intense topic of interest," said Robert Cohen, co-chief of the SEC's Market Abuse Unit.
Credit Suisse, meanwhile, was charged with misrepresenting that its Crossfinder dark pool utilized a feature called Alpha Scoring to characterize subscriber order flow monthly in an objective and transparent manner.
In its charge, the SEC said that Alpha Scoring included "significant subjective elements, was not transparent, and did not categorize all subscribers on a monthly basis" and that Credit Suisse "misrepresented that it would use Alpha Scoring to identify 'opportunistic' traders and kick them out of its electronic communications network, Light Pool. In fact, Alpha scoring was not used for the first year that Light Pool was operational."
In December last year, three of JPMorgan's Hong Kong-based equities businesses were fined a collective $30 million by the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) for failing to properly implement its dark pool trading venue.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Friendly fire? Nasdaq squeezes MTF competitors with steep fee increase
The stock exchange almost tripled the prices of some datasets for multilateral trading facilities, with sources saying the move is the latest effort by exchanges to offset declining trading revenues.
Europe is counting its vendors—and souring on US tech
Under DORA, every financial company with business in the EU must report use of their critical vendors. Deadlines vary, but the message doesn’t: The EU is taking stock of technology dependencies, especially upon US providers.
Regulators can’t dodge DOGE, but can they still get by?
The Waters Wrap: With Trump and DOGE nipping at regulators’ heels, what might become of the CAT, the FDTA, or vendor-operated SEFs?
CFTC takes red pen to swaps rules, but don’t call it a rollback
Lawyers and ex-regs say agency is fine-tuning and clarifying regulations, not eliminating them.
The European T+1 effect on Asia
T+1 is coming in Europe, and Asian firms should assess impacts and begin preparations now, says the DTCC’s Val Wotton.
FCA sets up shop in US, asset managers collab, M&A heats up, and more
The Waters Cooler: Nasdaq and Bruce ATS partner for overnight market data, Osttra gets sold to KKR, and the SEC takes on DOGE in this week’s news roundup.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 312: Jibber-jabber
Tony, Reb, and Nyela talk about tariffs (not really), journalism (sorta), and pop culture (mostly).
Experts say HKEX’s plan for T+1 in 2025 is ‘sensible’
The exchange will continue providing core post-trade processing through CCASS but will engage with market participants on the service’s future as HKEX rolls out new OCP features.