Plugging Away: Embracing Open Standards
The Hyperledger Project and various ISO efforts on display at Sibos show that the future is non-proprietary
Arriving at my hotel in Geneva for Sibos last week—urgently needing to charge my phone, check my email and style my hair—I realized that I had brought the wrong electrical plug adapter with me. I called down to reception and they had just five minutes before they lent their last one to another guest. Thank goodness for the far-sighted vendor that put a universal adapter in its swag bag!
Perhaps I could have been better organized on this occasion, but I'm sure that anyone who has ever traveled has at one time or another thought, 'Why the hell isn't there a universal standard for plugs?'
I heard the same question asked at Sibos, except it was of securities markets standards. In the case of plugs, the answer is that standardization efforts started too late. By the time authorities could seriously address the issue, manufacturers of appliances in different countries had developed their own plugs and sockets to varying degrees of safety and soundness, and these had become standard in those countries. Which means vested interests have taken hold—and I had frizzy hair for the first day of Sibos.
In the case of financial services, the answer is more complicated. Electrical appliances are not securities, and while there is indisputably a need for better standards, universal standards are neither practical nor possible.
But the history of plugs does serve to illustrate how standardization efforts are difficult, messy and often compromised by uneven development across geographies and by vested vendor interests.
In Geneva, standards were very much on the agenda, if only as central topics of discussion at the Standards Forum—the "off-off-Broadway of Sibos," as I heard it described. ISO 20022 harmonization for messaging continues, driven by centralizing initiatives such as Target2-Securities, and the International Standards Organization continues its work with the International Securities Identification Number for derivatives reporting, driven by regulation.
Standards also underpinned discussions around sexier topics such as distributed ledgers, in which it is widely accepted that interoperability must be achieved in these early stages of the technology's adoption in order for ledgers to work together.
What seems important about these efforts is that financial services are embracing open standards. Banks, exchanges, consultants and vendors are involved in the Hyperledger Project, for instance, which had a stand at Sibos and is an initiative to build open standards for blockchain interoperability.
Open standards alone can't save a technology from vendor lock-in, but they are important. Standardization efforts bring together energetic and dedicated people who can share their expertise. It may be hard work, but the message to financial services standards projects could be expressed thus: it is necessary, so keep plugging away.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Emerging Technologies
This Week: What is going on?
Is it weird that Euronext bought Substantive? It’s weird, right? Plus WFIC, tick sizes, Microsoft and BlackRock want more datacenters for some reason, and, of course, AI. What does it all mean?
Waters Wavelength Ep. 288: Media’s changing landscape
Wei-Shen and Tony discuss ways to improve the podcast going forward.
Fidelity’s quantum exploration unites theory and proof
The asset manager and Amazon have teamed to put a quantum twist on machine learning.
GenAI could connect ‘constellation’ of vital information technologies
At WFIC, Six Group’s Marion Leslie highlighted the opportunities and risks that the technology holds.
Why can’t we be friends?
The ABA vs most every regulator. LSEG vs BBG. AI vs SaaS. Buy vs build. Lots of drama in the capital markets.
DORA will change the buy vs. build debate… maybe
Waters Wrap: With DORA’s deadline looming, trading firms are having to reassess their long-term tech strategies. Anthony wonders if that means more building and less buying.
JSE rolls out exchange data to cloud Marketplace, built with DataBP
The move—part of a broader cloud migration at the exchange—allows financial firms to connect and subscribe to JSE news, market data, and analytics via the cloud.
The SEC needs a hand with artificial intelligence
The SEC wants to take a tough stance on AI, but it has a talent problem… or a marketing problem. Or both…