Panel Discussion: The Buy-Side Challenges of Complying with the Market Abuse Regulation
The Market Abuse Regulation was designed to detect and deal with various forms of market abuse, including insider trading and market manipulation, forcing buy-side firms to deploy new technologies in order to comply.
Panelists:
- Elinor Murray, deputy head of European compliance, Janus Henderson Investors
- Gautam Sachdev, managing director, global head of monitoring & surveillance, Risk Management Group, Macquarie Group
- Bruno Piers de Raveschoot, chief operating officer, RIMES Technologies’ RegTech Division
- Moderator: Victor Anderson, editor-in-chief, Waters and WatersTechnology
Issues covered in this 33-minute webcast include:
- The current state of play with respect to buy-side firms complying with the central tenets of the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) and what their most acute pain points are.
- The issues buy-side firms tend to underestimate in terms of complexity when it comes to complying with MAR.
- The technologies/services available to buy-side firms to assist them on the compliance front.
- The functions/ingredients that a competent MAR platform/service should include.
- How buy-side firms can satisfactorily address the significant data challenges when complying with MAR with respect to market, reference and pricing data and news feeds.
- The operational and technology challenges associated with accurate and reliable market surveillance – for example looking at various forms of market manipulation, monitoring trading activities across multiple asset classes and markets, and possibly even monitoring activities at the fill level – from an end-user (buy-side) perspective.
- The extent to which emerging technologies (such as AI) can be used to monitor and detect market abuse.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
How gatecrashers could spoil the tokenization party
Blockchain can curb settlement risks, but that could come at the expense of new third-party risks.
US regulators remove FIGI proposal from joint FDTA rules
The Financial Data Transparency Act’s final rules omit an earlier proposal to establish the FIGI as a common financial instrument identifier across regulatory reporting activities.
Can Canada follow in the US’s footsteps in overnight trading?
Canadian marketplaces and trading venues are in a race to see who can first authorize overnight equities trading, but not everyone is convinced of its value.
Will SEC reporting proposal supercharge alt data providers?
An SEC proposal that would let companies opt out of quarterly reporting disclosures could be a boon for alternative data providers.
Paxos wins temporary approval for blockchain clearing push
Blockchain infrastructure company will have a period of 18 months to “ramp up” readiness for operations, per the SEC’s approval letter.
Is a 2027 T+1 move too soon for Hong Kong?
The Waters Wrap: Wei-Shen examines HKEx’s discussion paper on moving to T+1 in Q4 2027. A move so soon has its benefits but still requires careful consideration, she says.
EU AI Act leaves agents in regulatory limbo
A new paper published by AI ethicists draws attention to a hole in the EU AI Act surrounding high-risk agentic systems.
AI governance rules coming soon, says CFTC chair
Selig doesn’t want to stifle innovation, but says trading or advice algos will need guardrails.