Nasdaq Launches Dark Pool Surveillance Monitoring Module for Smarts
Smarts Surveillance for Dark Pools aims at bringing greater transparency to “non-lit” trading.
The module, named Smarts Surveillance for Dark Pools, has been launched by Nasdaq in response to greater regulatory interest in dark pool trading. It provides capabilities to extend the Smarts trade surveillance platform ─ winner of the Best Sell-Side Market Surveillance Product category at this year's Sell-Side Technology Awards ─ and is designed to extend surveillance functionality and maintain compliance for dark pool operators.
The module provides surveillance capabilities on market manipulation and abusive behaviors such as price manipulation, insider trading, front running, and cross-market (lit vs dark) manipulation.
"In order to ensure integrity and compliance, dark venue operators and participants internalizing or crossing order flow, or externally participating in dark venues, need to have processes and systems in place to monitor activity for manipulative trading," says Michael O'Brien, head of product development for Smarts Trade Surveillance. "Not only does this support regulatory compliance needs, it is simply good business practice, particularly in a quickly evolving marketplace like dark pools."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Waters Wavelength Ep. 342: LexisNexis Risk Solutions’ Sophie Lagouanelle
This week, Sophie Lagouanelle, chief product officer for financial crime compliance at LNRS, joins the podcast to discuss trends in the space moving into 2026.
Citadel Securities, BlackRock, Nasdaq mull tokenized equities’ impact on regulations
An SEC panel of broker-dealers, market-makers and crypto specialists debated the ramifications of a future with tokenized equities.
FIX Trading Community recommends data practices for European CTs
The industry association has published practices and workflows using FIX messaging standards for the upcoming EU consolidated tapes.
Interview: Linda Middleditch, Regnology
Regnology’s Linda Middleditch discusses its acquisition of Wolters Kluwer’s FRR business
Tokenized assets draw interest, but regulation lags behind
Regulators around the globe are showing increased interest in tokenization, but concretely identifying and implementing guardrails and ground rules for tokenized products has remained slow.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 341: Citi’s Pitts and Topa
This week, Citi’s Michele Pitts and Marcello Topa join Wei-Shen to talk about UK and EU T+1.
Why source code access is critical to DORA compliance
As DORA takes hold in EU, Adaptive’s Kevin Covington says that it is shining a light on the criticality of having access to source code.
Nasdaq’s blockchain proposal to SEC gets mixed reviews from peers
Public comment letters and interviews reveal that despite fervor for tokenization, industry stakeholders disagree on its value proposition.