Numerix Adds 'Las Vegas Monte Carlo' Exposure Calculation to Analytics
New approach uses algorithmic exposure method to generate scenarios, simulate future values.
A challenge since 2008 with the introduction Basel II and III, Solvency II insurance regulation and IFRS 13, financial institutions are required to hold capital and reserves sufficient to support their risks. The monitoring, hedging or optimization of risk has been compounded with the Risk Weighted Assets minimal capital requirement (RWA), Counterparty Credit Exposures (CCE) and Credit Value Adjustment (CVA) as well as Funding Value Adjustment (FVA) and related XVA adjustments.
“Quantitatively all of these measures are linked to the price and exposure distribution at future time horizons," says Dr. Serguei Issakov SVP, global head of quantitative research. "This requires portfolio level Monte Carlo based simulations capable of producing risk neutral pricing at future time horizons along real world scenarios. The challenge then becomes how to combine scenario generation – both in risk neutral and real world measures to obtain exposures along a given scenario at a future time horizon. For large portfolios of deals, these calculations can require billions of simulation paths and can take significant amounts of time.”
Backward Induction
Using iterative backward induction, the new method of simulation of exposures can be applied in the contexts of various valuation adjustments (XVA) accounting for counterparty risk, funding and capital, the calculation of risk measures that use averages of future values, such as VaR and expected shortfall for market risk, and PFE, EPE/ENE, for counterparty risk, scenario generation, and in real world measures.
“In our research we’ve generalized the backward induction to compute a future value of a derivative on real world scenarios that corresponds to the full instrument value on future dates with effects of exercises and triggers included,” says Dr. Alexander Antonov, SVP of quantitative research and development. “Referred to as the Las Vegas Monte Carlo method, this approach enables a much more efficient exposure of path dependent instruments especially options with early exercise optionality like Barriers, Bermudan Swaptions and Autocaps. Also for those instruments where option value is dependent on underlying fixings history like an Asian and Lookback option.”
To determine algorithmic exposure under real world measure a resampling technique may also be applied – essentially resampling of the price distribution on the future observation date. The Numerix resample algorithm obtains risk neutral pricing on real world scenarios based on backward Monte Carlo.
“The approach avoids the inefficiency of the Brute Force approach for simulation on real world economic scenarios and dramatically reduces computation times by using resampling to connect real world scenarios with American Monte Carlo," Antonov adds.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
Navigating the MarketAxess ICE storm
The Waters Wrap: Most of the discussion surrounding ICE’s MarketAxess buy has focused more on benefits for the front office than the data possibilities.
On vibe coding, no/low-code dev, and some potential misconceptions
The Waters Wrap: Is no-code/low-code even a thing anymore? Not really. But the companies that championed those terms just a few years ago tell Anthony they aren’t going anywhere.
SEC gunning to take over CAT in 2027
Chairman Atkins has plans for the SEC to run the Consolidated Audit Trail directly. Industry participants are split on the idea.
Rapid-fire repo raises hopes of cheaper, faster trading
Tokenized Treasuries piloted by DTCC could squash settlement cycles and enable 24/7 repo.
Stopgaps and fail-safes: How trading vendors guard against rogue AI agents
TradeStation’s newest trading tool, Titan-X, uses agentic tools to help plan, execute, and collect data on trades.
A tidal wave of token costs threatens landfall
Budgeting for AI was never “easy,” but as financial firms rely more heavily on agents, soaring token usage is forcing them to rethink the economics of modern enterprise AI.
Is this tokenization’s golden opportunity?
The Waters Wrap: More initiatives around tokenizing assets are coming to fruition. Nyela asks: Is the market ready?
EuroCTP wins again, Fanatics teams up with BGC, Clarity Act’s uncertain future, and more
The Waters Cooler: A recap of the major tech and data news from the past week in the capital markets.