Michael Shashoua: AMQP Is Standards’ Latest Challenger

The recent launch of the Advanced Messaging Queuing Protocol adds another contender to the field of several messaging protocols for financial services. Michael considers the attributes of the newest entrant and what it means for true standardization in the industry.
A defining conflict for the financial services industry as it heads into 2012 will be determining which of many messaging standards and protocols should prevail—or whether there needs to be a decisive choice among them in the first place.
This year’s Sibos conference was dominated by discussion of legal entity identifiers (LEIs), expected to be implemented in 2012 at the behest of the US Treasury’s Office of Financial Research, and also expected to eventually spread worldwide as a standard for identifying securities. Sibos also saw ongoing efforts to promote adoption of the ISO 20022 and Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) standards.
Initial Frenzy
Add to the competing field of messaging standards the following acronyms and initialisms: FIX, FIXML, FpML, FAST, TCP and UDP. (I guess FIXML would be part acronym and part initialism, because you pronounce part of it as a word, and the rest as letters—see the “Cheerleaders” episode of Penn & Teller’s entertaining Showtime cable TV series for a discourse on this, referring to a tangle of names of scholastic cheerleading administrative organizations).
Last month saw the addition of one more, the Advanced Message Queuing Protocol or AMQP 1.0, whose developers say it will simplify trading communications, and interactions between risk management systems, as well as reduce the number of destinations a firm has to reach with messages. Hanno Klein, a senior vice president at Deutsche Börse, says AMQP also improves trade confirmation messages and organization of information on trades.
AMQP’s developers sought to meet criteria of applicability, interoperability, manageability and ubiquity, according to Robert Godfrey, a vice president at JPMorgan Chase who works on an integration services team advising and supporting on deployments of AMQP technology at the firm. “AMQP has to be everywhere,” he says. “When people say messaging, they should think of AMQP.”
Everything in Its Place
Although the industry might like to have one all-encompassing universal messaging and identification standard, akin to a universal power plug or outlet, according to Klein’s analogy he provided attendees at the AMQP launch event, there appears to be distinct needs served by each acronym-named standard, which he acknowledges.
“One has to be realistic about what we can do with standards and how fast we can change the community,” says Klein. “We started in settlement with Swift, ISO 15022 and now 20022 messages. We do a lot with FIX protocol—FIXML being XML syntax for FIX. FpML is more for the over-the-counter (OTC) space where it’s about describing very complex products, which are actually contracts between parties. We use FAST in market data for bulk data on order books, trades, reference data and the like for trading.”
So, can the financial industry be like electrical power outlets when it comes to standards—accommodating multiple formats within one universal framework (if that’s enabled by adapters), or should it be more like the governance of internet addresses, regulated worldwide by ICANN in the form of IP addresses?
That depends on the securities industry’s ability to produce a code or set of standards that could include every one of the aforementioned formats and connect them seamlessly together. The performance of AMQP will determine whether it can be that ubiquitous umbrella, or at least pave the way to the interoperability its developers envision.
More on Regulation
SEC pulls rulemaking proposals in bid for course correction
The regulator withdrew 14 Gensler-era proposals, including the controversial predictive data analytics proposal.
Trading venues seen as easiest targets for Esma supervision
Platforms do not pose systemic risks for member states and are already subject to consistent rules.
The Consolidated Audit Trail faces an uncertain fate—yet again
Waters Wrap: The CAT is up and running, but with a conservative SEC in place and renewed pressure from politicians and exchanges, Anthony says the controversial database faces a death by a thousand cuts.
Exchanges plead with SEC to trim CAT reporting requirements
Letters from Cboe, Nasdaq and NYSE ask that the new Atkins administration reduce the amount of data required for the Consolidated Audit Trail, and scrap options data collection entirely.
EU banks want the cloud closer to home amid tariff wars
Fears over US executive orders have prompted new approaches to critical third-party risk management.
Friendly fire? Nasdaq squeezes MTF competitors with steep fee increase
The stock exchange almost tripled the prices of some datasets for multilateral trading facilities, with sources saying the move is the latest effort by exchanges to offset declining trading revenues.
Europe is counting its vendors—and souring on US tech
Under DORA, every financial company with business in the EU must report use of their critical vendors. Deadlines vary, but the message doesn’t: The EU is taking stock of technology dependencies, especially upon US providers.
Regulators can’t dodge DOGE, but can they still get by?
The Waters Wrap: With Trump and DOGE nipping at regulators’ heels, what might become of the CAT, the FDTA, or vendor-operated SEFs?