August 2016: Telling the Difference Between Skill and Luck
The difference between skill and luck came under the spotlight after the golden period of the mid-2000's when asset managers produced-double returns. Transparency into how assets are managed is the best way to differentiate the two.
It’s unclear who or where the aphorism “a rising tide lifts all boats” comes from, given that there are instances of its existence dating back to 1915. But it is often attributed to John F. Kennedy, who used it in a speech in 1963 to deflect criticism that a dam he was inaugurating was considered by his political rivals to be a “pork barrel project”—a public work or project whose primary beneficiaries are a politician’s constituents, who will return the favor by way of future political support.
Warren Buffett used it when referring to the equities markets on both sides of the Atlantic in the mid-2000s, explaining, inter alia, that a booming economy and a healthy capital markets sector ensure that investment returns are good, irrespective of who or how those investments are being managed. The notion that asset managers could produce double-digit returns at the time “without getting out of bed” led many to question how investors could discern skill from luck. It’s a question that lingers to this day across the buy side.
In a similar vein, I remember speaking to Catherine Doherty, CEO and principal at Investit, as the global equity markets cooled in the prelude to the global financial crisis of 2008. During that conversation, she explained that the research her firm had done indicated that investors were far more patient and willing to retain asset allocations with buy-side firms if they felt the asset manager was able to provide clear and logical evidence that it had made the best possible investment decisions in line with their mandates, regardless of whether those decisions had produced any material return or not. The key, she said, is transparency.
The point of these anecdotes is that technology now, more so than ever, plays a crucial role in not only complying with increasingly restrictive and stringent regulations, but it’s also a means—the only means—by which money managers are able to provide investors with auditable, unbiased evidence that they are indeed providing the levels of services commensurate with what was agreed when mandates were awarded. This notion permeates every business process where a service is provided to an investor or a client. It’s also one of the reasons why BISAM’s March 2016 acquisition of market risk specialist FinAnalytica makes so much sense: It provides BISAM’s asset management clients with the means to not only provide transparency around performance and attribution, but also shed light on the level and types of risk consumed when chasing that performance. The risk component might not directly affect the outcome, but it does provide investors with an added level of transparency into how their assets are being managed. And that can only be a good thing.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Trading Tech
Interop after acquisitions remains daunting for buyers
Executives from a variety of vendors speaking at WFIC explained why desktop interoperability is important and why progress has been slow.
Should banks risk lightning hitting twice for CrowdStrike?
Bank tech teams divided on whether to give security vendor a second chance after update crash.
Northern Trust adds fixed-income capabilities for outsourced trading in Asia-Pacific
The custodian bank now offers 24/6 fixed-income trading coverage with desks in Chicago, London, and Sydney.
South Africa’s equity markets court HFTs with tech upgrades
Competition for flow has driven innovation in connectivity, risk, and data provision.
Dealer relief at delays to Refinitiv Matching’s tech migration
First phase of replatforming for Swiss spot pairs set to be pushed to mid-2025.
Kepler Cheuvreux builds proprietary execution platform with Adaptive
The broker wants to move away from third-party technologies as DORA’s risk management requirements could make vendor relationships more cumbersome.
Let’s grow the third-party risk playbook – CME security chief
The CrowdStrike outage has highlighted the need for the financial sector to adjust its game plan.
Facing platform shutdown, former IEX Cloud head buys its assets in 11th-hour bid
Tim Baker, Pedro Aguayo, and a silent partner have come together to purchase IEX Cloud’s assets days before the exchange was to retire all its products on August 31.