T-Minus One Year: It’s Now or Never on Mifid II
John hopes that preparations for the incoming regulation are top of the New Year’s resolutions pile for asset managers.

January is paradoxically the most optimistic and bleakest time of the year for some; while the cold, dark days are a far cry from the festive cheer just passed, it's also a time to make changes for the better, to be more than we have been in the past.
As such, it's rather fitting that Mifid II will finally be implemented on January 3 next year. While regulatory compliance isn't exactly optional, the industry has now reached its tipping point. For those firms that have yet to start work on implementing necessary systems or putting adequate policies in place, it's surely now or never.
Now you may be thinking, "Haven't we been here before though, John?" and you'd be right. Back at the start of September last year I said that the time for talking was over and that action was now required, despite the lingering vagaries around some key elements of the regulation.
And of course it's not as if each section of the regulation comes into force at the same time on January 3, 2018, with various parts spread out either over the course of this year or after next year's go-live date.
Generally speaking, there's no real reason for firms not be fully compliant by this time next year, especially when the year-long delay is taken into account. The question now is: How much longer will we be hearing that Mifid II preparations are either a top priority for asset managers, or, failing that, what the excuses for non-compliance in 2018 may be.
The MAR Test
My colleague, Aggelos Andreou, this week wrote about the buy-side's reaction to the implementation of the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) in July last year, which introduced stricter rules around surveillance, market manipulation and insider dealing.
While it seems that the majority of the buy side were able to get their house in order prior to the new rules coming in, some took advantage of a more lenient approach by regulators to earn a period of grace. I'm sure that by now we've all heard similar stories of planned procrastination within certain sections of the market concerning Mifid II readiness, with some participants either hoping to be overlooked or simply preferring to take a fine instead of the arduous work required.
Whatever happens in January next year, much still needs to be done. While MAR can show some indications of the readiness of the buy side for complicated new regulation, Mifid II is an entirely different beast with many more tentacles to untangle. Will a year be long enough for those laggards that have so far dragged their heels? My feeling is that no, it really isn't.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Doing a deal? Prioritize info security early
Engaging information security teams early in licensing deals can deliver better results and catch potential issues. Neglecting them can cause delays and disruption, writes Devexperts’ Heetesh Rawal in this op-ed.
SEC pulls rulemaking proposals in bid for course correction
The regulator withdrew 14 Gensler-era proposals, including the controversial predictive data analytics proposal.
Trading venues seen as easiest targets for Esma supervision
Platforms do not pose systemic risks for member states and are already subject to consistent rules.
The Consolidated Audit Trail faces an uncertain fate—yet again
Waters Wrap: The CAT is up and running, but with a conservative SEC in place and renewed pressure from politicians and exchanges, Anthony says the controversial database faces a death by a thousand cuts.
Exchanges plead with SEC to trim CAT reporting requirements
Letters from Cboe, Nasdaq and NYSE ask that the new Atkins administration reduce the amount of data required for the Consolidated Audit Trail, and scrap options data collection entirely.
EU banks want the cloud closer to home amid tariff wars
Fears over US executive orders have prompted new approaches to critical third-party risk management.
Friendly fire? Nasdaq squeezes MTF competitors with steep fee increase
The stock exchange almost tripled the prices of some datasets for multilateral trading facilities, with sources saying the move is the latest effort by exchanges to offset declining trading revenues.
Europe is counting its vendors—and souring on US tech
Under DORA, every financial company with business in the EU must report use of their critical vendors. Deadlines vary, but the message doesn’t: The EU is taking stock of technology dependencies, especially upon US providers.