January 2019: On the Origin of SIP Feeds
Evolution takes different forms within capital markets.
“I think it inevitably follows, that as new species in the course of time are formed through natural selection, others will become rarer and rarer, and finally extinct. The forms which stand in closest competition with those undergoing modification and improvement will naturally suffer most.”
Now, when Charles Darwin outlined key tenets of evolutionary theory in his foundational work, On the Origin of Species, he probably wasn’t thinking about gripes over market data fees. And while I am certainly not the first to draw parallels between evolution and economics—metaphors linking capitalism and survival of the fittest abound—Darwin’s theory is foundational because natural selection is a reliably solid visualization tool when mulling competition and capital markets.
Max Bowie cuts straight to the evolutionary core in his examination of the current framework for market data fees in the US: namely, how the traditional setup where SIP feeds consolidate data from all US exchanges can no longer thrive in an ecosystem where market data fees are on the rise.
Anthony Malakian, James Rundle and Wei-Shen Wong build upon the evolve-or-die concept with their analysis of Members Exchange (MEMX). In order to survive, the new exchange’s founding members—some of the biggest names in US equity markets that happen to be in competition with each other—will have to commit to radical collaboration. If they can pull it off, MEMX’s payoff could be historic, finally shaking up an environment that allows data fees to swell with limited recourse.
In her feature covering the major initiatives afoot to evolve corporate reporting of ESG factors, Kirsten Hyde looks at evolution from a different perspective, arguing that standardization of data is an essential component in improving ESG factor disclosure. While interest groups appear aligned on this, like most evolutionary progress, it will take some time.
After all, Darwin revised On the Origin of Species for two decades before publication.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Data Management
Editor’s Picks: Our best from 2025
Anthony Malakian picks out 10 stories from the past 12 months that set the stage for the new year.
Market data costs defy cyclicality
Trading firms continue to grapple with escalating market data costs. Can innovative solutions and strategic approaches bring relief?
LSEG partners with Citi, DTCC goes on-chain, AI on the brain, and more
The Waters Cooler: Trading Technologies buys OpenGamma, CT Plan updates, and the beginning of benchmarking in this week’s news roundup.
AI & data enablement: A looming reality or pipe dream?
Waters Wrap: The promise of AI and agents is massive, and real-world success stories are trickling out. But Anthony notes that firms still need to be hyper-focused on getting the data foundation correct before adding layers.
Data managers worry lack of funding, staffing will hinder AI ambitions
Nearly two-thirds of respondents to WatersTechnology’s data benchmark survey rated the pressure they’re receiving from senior executives and the board as very high. But is the money flowing for talent and data management?
Data standardization is the ‘trust accelerator’ for broader AI adoption
In this guest column, data product managers at Fitch Solutions explain AI’s impact on credit and investment risk management.
As AI pressures mount, banks split on how to handle staffing
Benchmarking: Over the next 12 months, almost a third of G-Sib respondents said they plan to decrease headcount in their data function.
Everyone wants to tokenize the assets. What about the data?
The IMD Wrap: With exchanges moving market data on-chain, Wei-Shen believes there’s a need to standardize licensing agreements.