Skip to main content

Few banks formally evaluate GenAI human-in-the-loop controls

Benchmarking: G-Sibs and challengers use tools to test controls efficacy; others rely on judgment.

genai

Only one in five banks use tools to formally monitor the effectiveness of the human-in-the-loop (HITL) controls they apply to generative AI or large language models (LLMs), Risk Benchmarking’s inaugural Model Risk Management study finds.

Four of the six global systemically important banks (G-Sibs) answering said they measure HITL effectiveness using key performance indicators to track metrics such as hit rates, escalations, and error detection, along with two challenger banks.

A further six banks

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Waterstechnology? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a WatersTechnology account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here