The research note from Ingo Walter, an NYU Stern Professor, surveyed 500 buy sides - finding that around a quarter of the world's top investment managers are still operating on legacy systems, despite their inherent challenges.
Those findings, Walter suggests, are owed to the expense and complexity of both implementing newer platforms and decommissioning the legacy kit, as well as to firms taking alternative routes, such as outsourcing or living with temporary workarounds. What distinguishes legacy vendors from those considered 'state-of-the-art', Walter says, is the ability to strike a delicate balance, pursuing two kinds of business strategies simultaneously.
"Unlike their legacy brethren, state-of-the-art vendors are adept at gaining new clients while holding onto to the ones they already have," he argues.
One way the research measures that component is a comparison of vendor research and development (R&D) spend as a percentage of total revenue in 2012, against clients' reported willingness to consider repurchasing the platform. A fairly consistent positive correlation was found to exist between the two, suggesting that greater research spend and ability to refresh platforms to fit existing requirements is key. Among the ten technology products compared, the R&D percentage ranged from 9 percent to 22 percent; the number considering repurchase, meanwhile, varied far more widely, from 38 percent to 92 percent.
Anthony and James look at developments pertaining to the Consolidated Audit Trail and wonder if big-tech companies could challenge traditional asset managers.Subscribe to Weekly Wrap emails
- Bloomberg’s Chat Gambit: The Feint Before a Knockout?
- In Capital Markets, Blockchain's Evolution Has Left the Bitcoin Model Behind
- WatersTechnology Innovation Summit Q&A: Elly Hardwick, Deutsche Bank
- Waters Wavelength Podcast Episode 96: CAT Concerns & Big Tech Takes Aim at Asset Managers
- House Approves Market Data Protection Act