A Slow Shift to ISO 20022
Strapline: Golden Copy

At last year's Sibos conference in Amsterdam, the Standards Forum, designed to promote the adoption of ISO 20022 and educate users to better understand this securities messaging standard, attracted a lot of traffic and attention. This month, when Sibos comes to Toronto, the Standards Forum promises to again attract a lot of interest at the conference.
Swift has fought an uphill battle to promote adoption of ISO 20022, which was first introduced in 2004. In July, the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation announced a re-engineering initiative that could be one spur to encourage adoption of 20022. There is no sunset date set for the older standard, ISO 15022, and even some Swift members don't want to end it because of its familiarity and other factors of convenience.
As reported in one of the features in this issue, Setting Standards in Stone, Swift is addressing its challenge of showing the industry a convincing business case for moving to 20022. Firms want a shorter return-on-investment time for making this change, and as an executive for service provider XSP says, "it is going to have to be the business user that pushes for this." Still, Euroclear's Edwin De Pauw, who adds his perspective to this story, as well as this month's "Interview With" column, says the focus of the Standards Forum should be the practical issues involved in moving to ISO messaging. De Pauw and colleagues from the industry will address this idea in numerous sessions during the Forum.
De Pauw also highlights the fact that ISO messaging has increased, which could support the move to 20022, and stresses that firms moving to ISO messaging should make that move to 20022 specifically, combining any business cases that may be separate. Swift itself has a MyStandards platform initiative, covered on page 5 of this issue, intended to provide a single point of access to all message types and the 20022 standard, connecting these to market practices and analytical frameworks.
The most valuable portion of the Standards Forum could be one entitled "Leveraging ISO 20022 as a business standard," scheduled for 10 am, September 20. If the business case is so important to promoting adoption of 20022, hearing views from IBM and Swift itself on how this can be achieved might be the best way for industry users to decide for themselves, or be truly convinced of the need to migrate. Another session in the Forum, "Let's get practical: Transforming Swift standards," extends the promise that Swift will streamline its development and maintenance of standards.
After more than six years, the question now regarding ISO 20022 is where the tipping point is for its adoption to become universal, or if it will even have such a milestone. This year's Standards Forum points to some key possibilities which can be leveraged to that end and some efforts, like those made by DTCC, that could be decisive. Will the same concerns still be on the agenda next year?
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Doing a deal? Prioritize info security early
Engaging information security teams early in licensing deals can deliver better results and catch potential issues. Neglecting them can cause delays and disruption, writes Devexperts’ Heetesh Rawal in this op-ed.
SEC pulls rulemaking proposals in bid for course correction
The regulator withdrew 14 Gensler-era proposals, including the controversial predictive data analytics proposal.
Trading venues seen as easiest targets for Esma supervision
Platforms do not pose systemic risks for member states and are already subject to consistent rules.
The Consolidated Audit Trail faces an uncertain fate—yet again
Waters Wrap: The CAT is up and running, but with a conservative SEC in place and renewed pressure from politicians and exchanges, Anthony says the controversial database faces a death by a thousand cuts.
Exchanges plead with SEC to trim CAT reporting requirements
Letters from Cboe, Nasdaq and NYSE ask that the new Atkins administration reduce the amount of data required for the Consolidated Audit Trail, and scrap options data collection entirely.
EU banks want the cloud closer to home amid tariff wars
Fears over US executive orders have prompted new approaches to critical third-party risk management.
Friendly fire? Nasdaq squeezes MTF competitors with steep fee increase
The stock exchange almost tripled the prices of some datasets for multilateral trading facilities, with sources saying the move is the latest effort by exchanges to offset declining trading revenues.
Europe is counting its vendors—and souring on US tech
Under DORA, every financial company with business in the EU must report use of their critical vendors. Deadlines vary, but the message doesn’t: The EU is taking stock of technology dependencies, especially upon US providers.