A Slow Shift to ISO 20022
Strapline: Golden Copy
At last year's Sibos conference in Amsterdam, the Standards Forum, designed to promote the adoption of ISO 20022 and educate users to better understand this securities messaging standard, attracted a lot of traffic and attention. This month, when Sibos comes to Toronto, the Standards Forum promises to again attract a lot of interest at the conference.
Swift has fought an uphill battle to promote adoption of ISO 20022, which was first introduced in 2004. In July, the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation announced a re-engineering initiative that could be one spur to encourage adoption of 20022. There is no sunset date set for the older standard, ISO 15022, and even some Swift members don't want to end it because of its familiarity and other factors of convenience.
As reported in one of the features in this issue, Setting Standards in Stone, Swift is addressing its challenge of showing the industry a convincing business case for moving to 20022. Firms want a shorter return-on-investment time for making this change, and as an executive for service provider XSP says, "it is going to have to be the business user that pushes for this." Still, Euroclear's Edwin De Pauw, who adds his perspective to this story, as well as this month's "Interview With" column, says the focus of the Standards Forum should be the practical issues involved in moving to ISO messaging. De Pauw and colleagues from the industry will address this idea in numerous sessions during the Forum.
De Pauw also highlights the fact that ISO messaging has increased, which could support the move to 20022, and stresses that firms moving to ISO messaging should make that move to 20022 specifically, combining any business cases that may be separate. Swift itself has a MyStandards platform initiative, covered on page 5 of this issue, intended to provide a single point of access to all message types and the 20022 standard, connecting these to market practices and analytical frameworks.
The most valuable portion of the Standards Forum could be one entitled "Leveraging ISO 20022 as a business standard," scheduled for 10 am, September 20. If the business case is so important to promoting adoption of 20022, hearing views from IBM and Swift itself on how this can be achieved might be the best way for industry users to decide for themselves, or be truly convinced of the need to migrate. Another session in the Forum, "Let's get practical: Transforming Swift standards," extends the promise that Swift will streamline its development and maintenance of standards.
After more than six years, the question now regarding ISO 20022 is where the tipping point is for its adoption to become universal, or if it will even have such a milestone. This year's Standards Forum points to some key possibilities which can be leveraged to that end and some efforts, like those made by DTCC, that could be decisive. Will the same concerns still be on the agenda next year?
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@waterstechnology.com or view our subscription options here: https://subscriptions.waterstechnology.com/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@waterstechnology.com to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@waterstechnology.com
More on Regulation
Waters Wavelength Ep. 342: LexisNexis Risk Solutions’ Sophie Lagouanelle
This week, Sophie Lagouanelle, chief product officer for financial crime compliance at LNRS, joins the podcast to discuss trends in the space moving into 2026.
Citadel Securities, BlackRock, Nasdaq mull tokenized equities’ impact on regulations
An SEC panel of broker-dealers, market-makers and crypto specialists debated the ramifications of a future with tokenized equities.
FIX Trading Community recommends data practices for European CTs
The industry association has published practices and workflows using FIX messaging standards for the upcoming EU consolidated tapes.
Interview: Linda Middleditch, Regnology
Regnology’s Linda Middleditch discusses its acquisition of Wolters Kluwer’s FRR business
Tokenized assets draw interest, but regulation lags behind
Regulators around the globe are showing increased interest in tokenization, but concretely identifying and implementing guardrails and ground rules for tokenized products has remained slow.
Waters Wavelength Ep. 341: Citi’s Pitts and Topa
This week, Citi’s Michele Pitts and Marcello Topa join Wei-Shen to talk about UK and EU T+1.
Why source code access is critical to DORA compliance
As DORA takes hold in EU, Adaptive’s Kevin Covington says that it is shining a light on the criticality of having access to source code.
Nasdaq’s blockchain proposal to SEC gets mixed reviews from peers
Public comment letters and interviews reveal that despite fervor for tokenization, industry stakeholders disagree on its value proposition.